Jeff Snyder
EF5
The problem with reporting "maximum winds" that the NHC provide are that they typically occur over a small area (and often aren't actually ever observed by surface observation stations), and this fact/observation very rarely is communicated properly in the media and on TV. I hope residents of the effected areas don't think that what they're seeing are 90 mph sustained winds with gusts to 110 mph. Current satellite data show a dry slot wrapping around Sandy, putting an end to the heavier precipitation. Radar data from nearby radars (e.g., KDIX) support this observation. KDIX VWP is showing ~100 kt winds at ~4 kft AGL. Typically, since the heavy rain helps to transport the stronger winds above the surface down to near the ground, a reduction in precip rates and coverage would be expected to reduce the potential for the strongest winds to be occur nearer the ground. I don't see why the same wouldn't occur with Sandy. I'd think that gusts near 70 mph are possible near the coast, but Sandy's sustained 90 mph winds will not be measured at the ground. I don't think even gusts to 90 mph will be observed. Heck, there's a good chance that no hurricane-intensity sustained winds will be observed. This is not to say that 60-70 mph gusts will be inconsequential, obviously!
Edit: Current HRD wind analysis. The hurricane-force winds are currently only occurring in a small area S of the center.
Edit: Current HRD wind analysis. The hurricane-force winds are currently only occurring in a small area S of the center.
