ATLANTIC: Hurricane Sandy

Good day all,

I had this thought after Isaac and it is even stronger than ever after Sandy: it might be time to consider revamping or enhancing the Saffir-Simpson hurricane rating scale. According to this scale, one of the biggest and most destructive storms in decades was only a Category 1 (and possibly not even "officially" a hurricane at all) upon landfall.

An Enhanced Saffir-Simpson Scale could factor in storm surge, size of the wind field, potential for inland flooding or other secondary impacts, in addition to sustained wind speed. If these effects were also considered, Sandy (and probably Isaac as well, due to its storm surge) would have bumped up at least a notch or two.

Or, the NHC/NWS could rate hurricanes after the fact, as is currently done for tornadoes, based on damage surveys and other data. Hurricane warning/advisory products could simply emphasize the most dangerous anticipated effects, without giving them a rating that might be misleading and lead people to think "well, if it's only a Cat 1 there's no need to evacuate," etc.

The KEY thing here is the SIZE of the storm. Storm surge vs category has actually been dropped from most literature, even by the NHC, as those "tables" only describe a storm that is a "normal" hurricane size. In other words, a normal hurricane having a 25 nm wide eye, hurricane winds extending out about twice that distance, and surrounded by a gale (TS forced) wind envelope about 150 nm across. In that case, Cat-1 is a 4' surge, cat-2 up to 7', and so on to at least 18' for cat-5. This, also, assumes an average ocean sea-floor bathymetry (slope) off the coast. A 15' surge on the FL east coast means a 25' surge (by the SAME storm) had it hit the FL west coast / Gulf.

Issac was another very large category-1 hurricane (like Irene a year earlier). More impressive, both storms had exceptionally low pressures at landfall, despite being a category 1 (Isaac actually broke a record for having the lowest pressure for a strong tropical storm)!

sawf1.jpg


Above: Surface flow fields of Sandy when off NC coast (wow - That's BIG)!

The sheer size of hurricane (or subtropical gale / storm) Sandy had the effects of strong TS / minimal hurricane forced winds over an extremely large area. This has to do with the "fetch" (distance) the winds blow across the water, and the longer this distance, the larger the generated waves and / or surges. Basically, a storm of category-five strength that is 50 miles across with a 10 mile-wide eye coming ashore in NC could indeed create a storm surge of 15-18 feet. However, a storm like Irene or Sandy coming in can also create a surge of that height, despite being barely a category one. It's all about the distances, or the fetch.

Hurricane Ike in Texas as also a large storm in 2008, coming in as a strong cat-2 near Galveston. The surge approached 20 feet, owing to the storm size and shallow sea floor (Gulf states). 20 feet, using the OLD scale, would yield a strong category 5 storm, but it was only a 2.

schsmod.jpg


Above: Storm surge chart for an AVERAGE sized (normal) hurricane and average sea floor.

There are many examples of large and small hurricanes. Hurricane Charley did make landfall on a coastline with shallow water (Gulf coast) in W Florida on 2004, and as a STRONG category 4 storm. The storm surge barely reached 8 feet. This was because the core of the hurricane (envelope of major winds over 110 MPH) was about 5 miles from the center, about an eye less than 3 miles wide. A very small hurricane wind and gale envelope surrounded Charley, so there was no long fetch to "push" water in. Yet, getting back to hurricane Ike in 2008, the storm eye was about 50 nm wide, with a 900 mile wide gale envelope and hurricane forced winds extending 250+ miles from the center. The storm tides exceeded 10 feet above normal, still under light winds and blues skies, 24 hours before landfall - People were drowning long before they even saw the darkening skies from Ike!

scheycmp.jpg


Above: Comparisons of the sizes of two intense hurricanes, Isabel in 2003 and Charley in 2004 ... Showing eye structure and eyewall (max wind) maximas.

In a nutshell ... Storm surge / wave models must take into consideration not only the windspeeds, but the shape and undersea countours near and especially right of landfall, and the size of the storm and how long the fetch (wind distances) are. These factors will greatly determine the threat (just "because it's just a ONE" doesn't mean it can't do more damage than a category 3)!

Also, a larger storm inflicts more damage away from the water than a smaller one of equal (or even stronger) intensity because of wind duration. Having 10 hours of 80-85 MPH winds should cause more damage than 30 minutes of 90-100 MPH winds. This longer duration weakens structures due to fatigue (like bending a metal spoon 2-3 times versus 20 times = breaks).

Considering the size of Sandy, it's tropical storm forced / gale envelope (38 to 73 MPH winds) extended at one point to over 500 nm from the center, with one side over Bermuda and the other ashore in the Carolinas! The hurricane forced winds in Sandy were not even symmetrical, as a matter of fact, on the LEFT side of the storm (south side at NJ landfall and blowing OFFSHORE). The devastation was caused by sustained 50-70 MPH winds blowing across MANY miles of fetch - And forcing this wave / surge right into a "funnel" shaped coast (NJ / NY harbor mouth).

Just be safe and MOVE OUT OF THE WAY when a LARGE system is coming in!
 
I agree with Elaine, and her point is supported by the extensive information that Chris provided. The Saffir-Simpson category measurements simply do not tell enough about the true specific dangers of the storm in a given geographical area. Perhaps separate scales for surge, wind and rainfall would be helpful. I like Elaine's idea of a (separate) post-storm rating based on actual damage, analogous to the EF scale for tornados.
 
Belated posting of my own Sandy experience:

I live in southeast PA and grew up in western Long Island NY, so have made many trips to the Long Island and NJ coasts during what were just "brush-by's" from tropical systems. During Irene, I spent the night at a friend's house near the coast in Belmar, NJ only to get chased away from certain beaches by cops the next morning (landfall had just occurred to the south near Atlantic City) and to see big surf and some inland flooding but unimpressive wind at other beaches before getting chased away from there as well. So for Sandy, I did not plan an intercept for the following reasons:

- landfall after dark (at one point the forecast was for after midnight)
- no real eyewall to chase due to the transition to extratropical; big wind field almost everywhere in my general area
- no large structures or parking garages to hang out in at the shore
- storm projected to move right through southern PA, which had two implications: one, needing to be home with my family to keep them calm and deal with power outages, and two, without a real eyewall, the wind field was so huge that watching from home was as good a place as any
- too much trouble with authorities blocking access on the heavily populated NJ coast

Overall, I was thinking of this more as a nor'easter than a hurricane. I went to Belmar NJ on Monday morning (about 10 hours before landfall) and saw the impressive surf (but nothing I hadn't seen in other storms) and already some flooding from the back bays (and resulting road closures).

By the afternoon I was back home and actually thought the winds were much weaker than I anticipated; I knew the center was a ways away, but figured with no real eyewall there would have been stronger winds well ahead of landfall. But the peak of the storm finally affected my area from 7:30-10:30 PM (landfall was at about 8:00PM I think, near Atlantic City). I watched from my porch, which was on the lee side of my house. The wind sounded like jet engines. I heard a couple of trees snap and saw several power flashes. My town had a number of downed trees and power lines; we lost power for about 48 hours.

Without power, I didn't get to see the news so didn't realize how hard the NY and NJ coasts had been hit until a few days later, and while it is impossible to live here without having some understanding of the devastation, I haven't even had the time to look at too many pics/videos of the aftermath- strange for a guy that has been fascinated by hurricanes all his life.

I somewhat regretted not full-out chasing this storm. I have been chasing tornados on the Plains for 15 years but have never really chased a landfalling hurricane and only experienced brush-by's. Here I had one in my own backyard, a once in a lifetime opportunity that I did not take. But it was also a rare opportunity to have such a system track through my own town, and the above reasons for not going to the shore are still valid, perhaps more so given the extensive storm surge, plus the reasons others mentioned such as traffic/population congestion, falling trees and potentially blocked roads, etc. It would have been very hard to find a spot to safely see the storm surge, and quite frankly I was not interested in, or prepared for, potentially having to spend days in the car especially with my family at home without power.

Jim




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 
Back
Top