• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Advice on Picking a Chase Target

Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
145
Location
Clearwater, KS
I've been digging through books and studying charts, and I'm starting to feel more comfortable identifying my own severe weather setups. I'm struggling, however, with transitioning from the big picture outlook to actually picking a chase target. Is it as simple as picking the spot where the moisture/instability/shear/lift stack up the best, or are there some general guidelines that can get me in the right area?

I have an easier time with this with respect to dryline storms, outflow boundaries, etc., as they are fairly well defined, but I have a harder time picking a spot when looking at charts that cover the whole middle of the country. Is it best to target areas under a shortwave trough, under a certain quadrant of a jet max, or some other generic guidance that works at least some of the time?
 
Everyone will have their own method, etc, etc. To go into a list of the full meteorological factors is not really appropriate here, though.

What I look for initially is the best combination of moisture, lift, and instability. Without these, deep moist convection won't occur. Then I will look for the region with the best shear, and see whether this overlaps with the combination mentioned above. Let's say there's a surface low developing in NW OK, with a dryline extending southwards, and an old outflow boundary lying E-W along I-40. Now, assuming that there is a decent upper flow, and a disturbance propagating from the west, I'd be thinking that somewhere in western Oklahoma for storm initiation. However, I like to be (if possible!) east of the developing storms, so that there's enough time to position ahead...remember that although storms can become severe very rapidly, supercells take time to mature. So, if I though storm initiation was somewhere between Sweetwater and Vinson, OK, I might pick Elk City, OK, as my initial target position. From here, I can monitor the developing situation and then position accordingly. To that end, if I pick a "target" city, it's not always where I think the best storm will occur, as it's almost impossible to narrow convective development down that locally - rather, it's a location with good road options, close to the region where I expect convection to develop, but to the east of that area (assuming storms will move with an east componant.).
 
Jim Ladue has an excellent online training presentation at:

Day 1 Chase Target Forecasting: How to Pick Your Target From 2-6 Hours in Advance by Jim Ladue

Jim Ladue said:
This presentation covers how to create target zones on the morning of a potential storm chase. I figure that most of us like to stay within 6 hours of an intended target. However some chasers don’t mind driving 8 hours or more to get to a target. Either way, the material in this presentation focuses on a methodology that will maximize your chances of satisfying your objectives in a storm chase.

I designed this talk with the assumption that you know the basics in meteorology analysis. In other words, you should be familiar with plotting, analyzing and understanding surface and upper air data. You should also be familiar with radar, satellite, profiler data and the numerical models most used in day-1 chase forecasting (e.g., RUC, ETA, AVN).

I gave this talk for the first time early in 2002 as part of Tim Vasquez's forecasting class. Tim's class is held with only several students at his house. It is this kind of setting with one-on-one interaction that brings out the best in this presentation. Afterall, it is very difficult to describe my drawing and annotations that I often do in person.
 
Here are my (not-so) quick tips for picking a target area the the night before. After doing an upper air analysis (with WV and IR sat imagery, RAOBs, VWPs, ) and looking at mid-upper atmosphere model discrepancies for the target period I use the COD regional views and draw each of the features (that I list below) from the GFS, WRF, RUC, SREF and sometimes the Euro and Ukie onto my white board with US overlay. Skip Talbot has framed all of the models on his website from all of the major sources, and it makes for very easy navigation. Using these inputs I then draw the 'consensus' line which will lean towards 1) what I gathered from my upper-air analysis 2) whichever model is more in line with the RUC at 12 hrs and even more influential- 3) whichever model has been performing better as of late.

The target should be refined in the morning using 12z RAOBs and model runs and should continue to be refined throughout the day based on analysis of vis sat, surface obs, SPC Mesoanalysis, radar (look for boundaries) and RUC updates (UCAR is quicker than COD with the updates, but COD has 'zoomed-in' regional views).

Note: You should have an idea of initiation time (step 6) before beginning the FCST map. SPC's SREF precip data are very helpful here, especially the Spaghetti 3hr convective pcpn > .01in map. Use the initiation time you deduce as your FCST time and complete all the steps (layers) for that specific time. If your initiation time is between model output times, 22z for example, you will have to make educated adjustments to the data (extrapolate the 18z data to 22z with the 00z data in mind).


1) Surface features- Draw the consensus surface low and notate the estimated strength (in mb). Draw the consensus boundaries (warm front, cold front and dry line).


2) Moisture- Narrow down the target area by drawing the consensus 60 degree isodrotherm. This should be within the warm sector drawn in the first step. Unless the max temps are in the 60's or low 70's, you'll be hard pressed to get a good storm below 60 td. Draw the 65 isodrotherm lightly if it is in or near the general target area.


3) Instability- The cut-off number for the area of delineation will change with the seasons and differ between systems, but a good number to use as a minimum for tornadoes is 1000 j/kg of MLCAPE. Draw a 2000 j/kg (or the next 1000 higher than the first line) line lightly if available.


4) Lift- Draw your lift line directly on the warm front and cold front, or dryline if there is one. This is where you should look at fcst soundings for your general target area along with fcst CINH. Place dots on your map where the sounding are and notate next to them how strong the CAP is progged to be (I use 1 through 10 with 10 being nuclear CAP). Take the line out into the warm sector as far as you think the CAP could be overcome (consider the current/overnight convection and where OFB's may be) and connect to the other line.


5) Shear- Start by drawing consensus 500mb wind barbs over a few locations in the target area, preferably near the fcst sounding locations. Then draw the consensus 850mb wind barbs and sfc wind barbs for the same locations. Draw FCST hodograph for extra credit :) The best shear areas will be subjective and change throughout the day, but try to circle the area within your warm sector where the best shear (speed and directional!) will be at the time of initiation. Which brings me to..


6) Precip- Take into account the WRF, GFS, and SREF forecast precip maps while considering a) how the CAP strength will change through the day and b) how the boundaries will move [ie retreating dryline, screaming cold front]. I have been very impressed with the performance of the NSSL's 4.0 km experimental WRF precip maps and simulated reflexivity. Delineate the areas where you think precip will break out while placing an emphasis on the areas where the likely storm mode will be supercellular.


7) Eye-candy models- Getting close to the end here so your FCST map should look like a hot mess. This is when I look at some of Earl's severe parameters like EHI, Sig Tor and Sup Composite. Skip Talbot has these models framed HERE at the top for easy navigation. I don't delineate an area for these because they are each dependant on the particular model, but I do factor these somewhat into my final target forecast.


This is where you take all of the factors above into account and draw your target area. I like to start off with a relatively large area where I think tornadoes are possible. Then I narrow down my target area and draw where I think tornadoes will be likely and then narrow that down further by placing a dot on the map as my target county. I then erase all of the lines and notes on the map except for the sfc low, sfc boundaries and target area. I don't look at the SPC's Day 1 before finishing because I think it makes me a better forecaster. This is what my finished product looks like:

010708outlooklo3.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the link, Bobby. The presentation is outstanding. I also like the whiteboard idea. It's tough marking up normal letter-size charts and I don't have a bigger printer. I think it's time to invest in a larger whiteboard.
 
Thanks for the link, Bobby. The presentation is outstanding. I also like the whiteboard idea. It's tough marking up normal letter-size charts and I don't have a bigger printer. I think it's time to invest in a larger whiteboard.

I would definitely recomend it, the one I have is only $8 shipped:
http://www.markerboardpeople.com/USM1116.htm

I hope my target selection summary made sense, I got a little carried away. In re-reading your initial question I think a quick answer would be: choose the dryline, tripple point or warm front. Watch for cumulus fields to develop and then get under them. If you go with the dryline, look for a 'bulge' or an area that sticks out further than the rest. "Tropospheric wind above the dryline will not be uniform across the entire dryline boundary. Surges of stronger tropospheric wind will advance the dryline forward along segment(s) of the dryline. Low level convergence and shear is enhanced along this advancing segment. Dryline thunderstorms can be initiated by this convergence enhanced uplift." -Haby Hints

Tim V has a great website for practicing target selection and it really challenges you becuase of the bare-bones data:
http://www.weathergraphics.com/edu/chase1/index.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hope my target selection summary made sense, I got a little carried away.

I appreciate the details. I still get a little lost in the details and acronyms so it is good practice to work through them. Overall I think I'm doing most of the right things, I just haven't established a consistent workflow so it is easy to get confused.

I've been thinking of how I would draw the map on a whiteboard, but the link you provided already has the map on the board. That alone is worth two or three times the cost of the board!

I'll work through Tim's case studies. I've been to his website to buy books, but I never looked for case studies. I'm a visually oriented person so I get a lot of mileage from them. You can tell me something a dozen times and I may understand, but show me a picture and I'll retain it for a long time.

Thanks again for the replies.
 
In a nutshell, I forecast to find the most favorable area for tornadoes. After I feel like I get a handle on that I look into where storms will fire (which boundaries, where will they be located, what time, etc). You also need to consider storm mode since that will have a huge influence on the the tornado threat. Once I figure that out I look downstream of where I expect storms to fire and determine which area/storms will have the most favorable environment for tornadoes. Depending on storm motions for the day I will pick a target some where between where I expect a storm to form (along the boundary) and where I expect it to mature/start to have tornado potential. If I there is a lot of uncertainty about exactly where the storm will fire exactly (like maybe I like a 80 mile stretch of the dryline) then I will pick a target a little further downstream from the boundary. That allows you time to move North or South before the storm gets to you. It basically keeps your options open and gives you more room for error. It kind of sucks doing it that way because you don't always get to watch towers going up along the boundary, but it is the most consistent way of getting on the best storm IMO. I know this is really short, but I'm crunched on time. Hopefully it helps a little.
 
targeting severe weather placement and analysis

Thanks to Jim Ladue's link, Chad's and Tim V's very nice links, presentation and synopsis of severe weather targeting.

Very nicely written and informative all around. Thanks for sharing.

I also like to consult the visuals from weather services that show the placement of the storms, severe cells and the NOAA websites and link areas.
 
I know this has somewhat been mentioned in the past couple of posts, but I feel that I ought to stress the importance of good road options and terrain when selecting a target area for storms. I can't add much to what has been said about the forecasting side of chasing, but my advice is just remember that the road networks are VERY important when it comes to chasing. Sometimes you can get trapped in a bad network and miss a tornado, etc. You sometimes can't really control this part of your chase target, but it's something to keep an eye on. Good terrain is also necessary for both knowing where you are in location to the parts of the storm and for good photo/video opportunities. You don't want to see a tree instead of a tornado right in front of you.

Keep in mind though, terrain and road networks aren't ABSOLUTELY essential to chasing, but they can be pretty darn helpful.

I hope I'm not reinventing the wheel, but that's my 2 cents.

BTW, great idea for the whiteboard for forecasting.
 
I agree with the above post. Road network is a huge determining factor in picking my chase target.
 
Back
Top