• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

9/20/04 FCST: Plains

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike Hollingshead
  • Start date Start date

Mike Hollingshead

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/an...fs_250_156m.gif

Rather interesting early fall setup for late next weekend into Monday-Tuesday. If this slows at all the above date will of course be no good. This is for the first day of the 'event', whenever it happens(quite possibly this will be Monday as the models love to be too fast). Second day likely be one big line along the coldfront. GFS wanting to put a fairly deep sfc low along the Canadian border and an even deeper on in nw KS under the nose of the jet. Lovely shear profile if that happens in sw NE and areas n-s.

http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/model/gfs1...hr_sfc_dewp.gif

Moisture return and capping could be a real concern. But it is 156 hours out, so we'll see.

System is going to hell...lol. I changed the date to Monday accordingly.
 
Yeah this system looks to be screwed. It's coming out highly positive tilt and it has a lovely trof over the gulf killing any return flow. It's pretty toast to me at this point. :(
 
I would not dismiss this system yet. A pretty good burst of heat and humidity should come out ahead of it. For example, this is a little far east but Chicago could reach near 90 on Wednesday. There has got to be something coming out of that air mass.
 
Yeah the problem is the models insist on a trof developing over the gulf and essentially blocking off the good return flow ahead of the system. And not only that but the system keeps wanting to come out very positive tilt with a strong cold front(boooooooo). I'm still waiting to see if this little gulf trof develops like eta, gfs, and ecmwf all say it will. I vote no.....lol.
 
Back
Top