• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

8/11/07 NOW: MN/WI

Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
616
Location
Lawrence, KS
Initiation is now underway in central-south central Minnesota within a very unstable environment. The SVR warned cell in Wright Co., 50 miles NW of Minneapolis, has been slowly strengthening and is beginning to show signs of rotation. There is also a developing Cu field in southwest MN which, if it can develop, will move into a more favorably sheared atmosphere with 0-3 km SRH up to 300 m2/s2.
 
Currently sitting in Dodge county, MN. Sitting under a cu field here, most with rather mushy vertical development. Not really sure what to expect yet. Temps have been flirting with the 90 mark all day, now around 85 here. Cap is still quite strong here in s MN, might head over to I-35 soon. Send me a pm if you can nowcast Chad. Some better towers going up to the north as I write this.
 
NOW - SW MN

Unfortunately, subsidence over the SRN half of MN appears to have suppressed convection in S and SW MN so far this afternoon despite little or no remaining CIN along with decent SFC moisture convergence. WV imagery does show a zone of assent just now entering SW MN. Perhaps convection is still possible within the hour despite cooling SFC temperatures. A persistent CU field between Sanborn and New Ulm, at the intersection of an old OFB and the SFC trough/CF, has produced a few failed attempts at convection, and this may be the area to watch as large scale assent approaches from the SW.

[FONT=&quot]- bill[/FONT]
 
Back
Top