• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

6/29/08 FCST: NJ/PA/NY/MA/DE

Bill Hark

EF5
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
1,354
Location
Richmond Virginia
icon_posticon.gif
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica]Posted - 06/29/2008 : 11:08:07 AM[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica]Nice setup for the northeast as a trough approaches and upper level low over the Great Lakes. There will be decent 500 SW flow with winds of 30-40 shifting eastward from PA and NY to NJ and other points eastward. There is a large area of 70 degree dewpoints for eastern PA, NJ into southern NY and northeast. The RUC is bullish with CAPE showing a large area of 1500 and a bullseye of 2000 in SE PA. The WRF shows less coverage with smaller areas of 1500 toward southern NJ, PA and SE NY into CONN and shifted eastward. Helicity is marginal at 50- 100 for eastern PA into central NY per WRF while the RUC shows 200 SRH for most of NJ by 00Z. I like the clearing over most of NW and SE PA on Satellite. Finding an area of backed surface winds will be problematic as the models show SE winds more toward the coast along NJ and better backing northward into SE NY into MA and New England area. I also don't like the SW 850 mb winds. This will definitely be a severe weather day for the northeast. The SPS mentions the possibility of an upgrade to moderate which I think is likely for damaging winds rather than tornadoes. I agree with their 5% risk for tornadoes. I have two potential targets, mutually exclusive due to traffic and distance. For better forecast surface backing Newburgh, New York. My other target is farther south in Philadelphia where the models are showing slightly better SRH and CAPE. Neither area is good chase country even for the northeast but since Philadelphia is a large metropolitan area, I would choose Newburgh, NY for best potential of tornadoes.

Bill Hark
http://www.harkphoto.com
[/FONT]
 
Back
Top