Brad Nelson
EF1
ICT forecast sounding
Couldn't agree with you more here Nick. I was peeking at some of the forecast soundings off of Bufkit earlier today and was immediately drawn towards the late afternoon and especially the early evening soundings off the NAM for ICT. Low level shear was very impressive and the hodographs had that classic sickel shape to them. Plus, they were throwing out there almost 1300 j/kg in CAPE which would certainly be enough instability for tomorrow's setup. For chasers sake, just hope that it isn't too late in the day before things really get going.
It isn't? Heck, the 024hr NAM forecast hodographs for ICT and HUT shows substantial low-level curvature, leading to very impressive (widespread) 0-1km SRH of 250-400j/kg across the warm sector. Yes, there is a rather deep-layer of unidirectional flow, but boundary layer directional shear is quite substantial (hence the pronounced low-level cyclonic curvature) and supportive of low-level mesocyclones. Thermodynamically speaking, the 1000-1500j/kg of surface-based CAPE isn't exactly "marginal" for a March setup, neither.
Needless to say, I'll stick to my original (albeit I'm not chasing this setup, nor any others for at least a few more weeks) target of ICT. I think there is a fair shot at a productive tornadic supercell in southcentral KS tomorrow afternoon.
Couldn't agree with you more here Nick. I was peeking at some of the forecast soundings off of Bufkit earlier today and was immediately drawn towards the late afternoon and especially the early evening soundings off the NAM for ICT. Low level shear was very impressive and the hodographs had that classic sickel shape to them. Plus, they were throwing out there almost 1300 j/kg in CAPE which would certainly be enough instability for tomorrow's setup. For chasers sake, just hope that it isn't too late in the day before things really get going.