Taylor Wright
EF2
I've been looking at this one a lot, and should be able to make it out this Saturday to chase, so I'll go ahead and start the discussion on this, albeit brief.
The uncertainty regarding this event still remains somewhat high despite only being two days out, due to the models differing on placement of surface features and regions of best instability. As the surface low moves eastward into Oklahoma, 20-30 kts of 0-1km shear should be present all the way from north-central TX into southern/southeastern KS.
The biggest fly in the ointment seems to be instability and initiation time, both not favorable due to warmer mid-level temps and poor lapse rates evident by both the GFS and NAM. Most of the recent NAM solutions have a massive MCS moving eastward of I-35 in eastern Oklahoma and Texas in the 21z time frame, not leaving much time for recovery for any discrete cells that may form on the dryline to the west. While the NAM is a bit more optimistic about instability (as usual), the GFS and NAM 4km agree with very marginal CAPE values of 500-750 J/kg. Relatively modest deep-layer shear values for this time of year (40-60 kts 0-6 km shear along the dryline) should keep updrafts from getting ripped apart, as has been an issue with some of the fall setups this year. The hope is that this, combined with very good low-level shear can make up for the lack of instability and we'll get some low-topped, tornado producing supercells. This setup has decent potential, but it seems that cloud cover and early-day convection may keep it from reaching that potential.
The best target area will likely be wherever the sun can poke through behind that MCS and where initiation will actually occur, as both of the NAMs have discrete cells only in southern KS by 00z, nothing in OK or TX. If I had to pick a target based off of what I've seen so far, it would likely be central Oklahoma down to the Wichita Falls area, where the best combination of low-level shear and instability should reside, although I may stay further north if adequate instability makes its way to the KS border along the northeast side of the low.
The uncertainty regarding this event still remains somewhat high despite only being two days out, due to the models differing on placement of surface features and regions of best instability. As the surface low moves eastward into Oklahoma, 20-30 kts of 0-1km shear should be present all the way from north-central TX into southern/southeastern KS.
The biggest fly in the ointment seems to be instability and initiation time, both not favorable due to warmer mid-level temps and poor lapse rates evident by both the GFS and NAM. Most of the recent NAM solutions have a massive MCS moving eastward of I-35 in eastern Oklahoma and Texas in the 21z time frame, not leaving much time for recovery for any discrete cells that may form on the dryline to the west. While the NAM is a bit more optimistic about instability (as usual), the GFS and NAM 4km agree with very marginal CAPE values of 500-750 J/kg. Relatively modest deep-layer shear values for this time of year (40-60 kts 0-6 km shear along the dryline) should keep updrafts from getting ripped apart, as has been an issue with some of the fall setups this year. The hope is that this, combined with very good low-level shear can make up for the lack of instability and we'll get some low-topped, tornado producing supercells. This setup has decent potential, but it seems that cloud cover and early-day convection may keep it from reaching that potential.
The best target area will likely be wherever the sun can poke through behind that MCS and where initiation will actually occur, as both of the NAMs have discrete cells only in southern KS by 00z, nothing in OK or TX. If I had to pick a target based off of what I've seen so far, it would likely be central Oklahoma down to the Wichita Falls area, where the best combination of low-level shear and instability should reside, although I may stay further north if adequate instability makes its way to the KS border along the northeast side of the low.
Last edited: