samuel stone
EF3
primarily regarding the 0z nam
with the 0z nam out, the only potential inhibbiting factor to me continues to be the quality and width of the instability axis. wind fields continues to be favorable at all levels of the atmosphere. nothing catches my attention as quickly as hard backed surface through 850 mb winds. which continues to be progged, cross over from 850 to 500mb should be nearly at a 90 degree angle so thats more than sufficient for supercell modes along the dryline and triple point in central/south central kansas and nw oklahoma. the only thing kinematically id like to possibly see get better is a harder push from the upper level speed maximum but i cant complain about the wswerlys above 300 mb. i didnt look too much at the gfs since i despise it but it appeared mid and upper level winds tended to have a slightly more meridional compenent to them so we'll see how that shakes out. for the one of the first times all year it apears there may be just enough of a cap but not too much as the main chunk of forcing for ascent is progged to hang back to the west hopefully just enough so that a 4-14-11 doesnt happen. keep fingers crossed on that that though as the models will likely waver still being 48 hrs out.
right now id say atleast a handfull of tornadoes appear probable over c/sc ks and nw ok, IF descent mid lvl lapse rates can push in in time, and a good deal of insolation
can take place along the dryline
monitoring visible satellite for breaks in a probable stratus deck during the early afternoon thursday will prove crucial. that will likely determine which areas along the dryline in sc ks/nw ok i will end up targeting. since Hutchinson is my home ill likely have plenty of time to monitor things. couldnt ask for a better setup geographically.
will be interesting to see which models gives in to the other over the next 36 hours but im taking the nam right now. hence this post.
Note; experiencing a thunderstorm in Hutchinson right now. this is the first thunderstorm weve had all year!!
with the 0z nam out, the only potential inhibbiting factor to me continues to be the quality and width of the instability axis. wind fields continues to be favorable at all levels of the atmosphere. nothing catches my attention as quickly as hard backed surface through 850 mb winds. which continues to be progged, cross over from 850 to 500mb should be nearly at a 90 degree angle so thats more than sufficient for supercell modes along the dryline and triple point in central/south central kansas and nw oklahoma. the only thing kinematically id like to possibly see get better is a harder push from the upper level speed maximum but i cant complain about the wswerlys above 300 mb. i didnt look too much at the gfs since i despise it but it appeared mid and upper level winds tended to have a slightly more meridional compenent to them so we'll see how that shakes out. for the one of the first times all year it apears there may be just enough of a cap but not too much as the main chunk of forcing for ascent is progged to hang back to the west hopefully just enough so that a 4-14-11 doesnt happen. keep fingers crossed on that that though as the models will likely waver still being 48 hrs out.
right now id say atleast a handfull of tornadoes appear probable over c/sc ks and nw ok, IF descent mid lvl lapse rates can push in in time, and a good deal of insolation
can take place along the dryline
monitoring visible satellite for breaks in a probable stratus deck during the early afternoon thursday will prove crucial. that will likely determine which areas along the dryline in sc ks/nw ok i will end up targeting. since Hutchinson is my home ill likely have plenty of time to monitor things. couldnt ask for a better setup geographically.
will be interesting to see which models gives in to the other over the next 36 hours but im taking the nam right now. hence this post.
Note; experiencing a thunderstorm in Hutchinson right now. this is the first thunderstorm weve had all year!!
Last edited by a moderator: