• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

10/21/07 NOW: OK

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
855
Location
Norman, OK
Numerous thunderstorms, some severe developing in central OK. This line is Northwest of KTLX from Osage Southeast to Commanche Counties. Logan, Payne, Kingfisher storms exhibiting some rotation. Storms are moving rapidly Northeast at over 55 MPH. Large hail is indicated by radar in excess of 1.5 inches with these storms..

To the south in Caddo county. A severe thunderstorm warning has been issued. This storm is producing hail indicated at around .5 inches by radar, and moving NE at 50 mph..

Tops on all cells approaching 40K Feet.

AS OF NOW the storms are appearing to weaken somewhat. The cell SE of Kingfisher still exhibiting large hail, and multiple meso indicators.

Logan/Payne/Noble Counties just went severe warned. Moving NE at 60 MPH!!! Hail will likely cover the ground!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Impressive Radar returns of 72 dbz.. Hail indicators over a large area indicating 2.50 inch hail. This cell is in Logan County, right over pleasant valley
 
Strong shear in place along with marginal MUCAPE suggests that some elevated supercell characteristics are possible. The TLX VWP indicates that the cold air is about 5000 feet deep, so there isn't a tornado threat. The most interesting thing to me is the periodicity of the convection... There have been ~6-7 cells lined about ~25-30 miles apart in a SW-NE fashion. As cells move off rapidly to the northeast, new ones develop back in southwestern OK. I can only think that there is some sort of (intertial?) instability associated with this very strong shear that is supporting such regular and consistent intervals between the convective cells.
 
I also find the radar presentation interesting. The way the storms continue to form in mini line segments in a NW to SE orientation is really neat to watch on radar loops. Looks like waves in the ocean moving toward shore with your view being from above. I agree with Jeff that the periodic occurrence of the storms in very intriguing.
 
Impressive Radar returns of 72 dbz.. Hail indicators over a large area indicating 2.50 inch hail. This cell is in Logan County, right over pleasant valley

This is a good example of how the single-radar 88D hail algorithms tend to overestimate, particularly when there is high reflectivity indicative of copious amounts of small, wet hail (as was actually reported with this cell). Not to brag, but our new NSSL multi-radar/multi-sensor hail algorithm was right on the money with a swath of 3/4" to 1" maximum hail size.

I agree the radar loops are great, and it's very cool how there appear to be left moving cells splitting off the north end of many of the segments. See the OKC TDWR loop here: http://wdssii.nssl.noaa.gov/web/wdss2/products/radar/tdwrloop_refl2.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top