Owen Shieh
EF2
Latest GFS model run has shifted the system east quite dramatically to landfall in FL panhandle. I'm very skeptical about it though, because at 12Z Thursday, it is already too far north (the center hasn't gained more latitude than Jamaica as the models indicates). The model assumed the earlier NW jog would continue, but judging from satellite, it has gone back to WNW, or just wobbled a bit to follow the blowup of convection in the western semicircle. So if the initial condition of the GFS is already wrong, it's landfall location can't be correct. It would be best to wait for its next run.
Also, the GFDL has the same problem because it uses the GFS initial conditions. So if the GFS is wrong, then the GFDL can't be trusted either. Best to wait for the next run before deciding on an eastward shift at landfall. Also, pay attention to satellite. If it doesn't continue NW and still returns WNW for a landfall in Jamaica, then New Orleans is not out of the woods yet.
This is chaos theory in action.....a slight 1-5 degree shift in motion can mean a difference of 100-200 nm at landfall.
Also, the GFDL has the same problem because it uses the GFS initial conditions. So if the GFS is wrong, then the GFDL can't be trusted either. Best to wait for the next run before deciding on an eastward shift at landfall. Also, pay attention to satellite. If it doesn't continue NW and still returns WNW for a landfall in Jamaica, then New Orleans is not out of the woods yet.
This is chaos theory in action.....a slight 1-5 degree shift in motion can mean a difference of 100-200 nm at landfall.