• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

01/02/06: FCST: Ohio Valley and Southward

A lot of things look pretty good about this setup. The only thing that bothers me a bit may be storms firing off to early hampering the ability to reach progged surface instabilities. Lots of 0 CINH by 18z and precipitation prior to.
There isn't a ridiclouis amount of lift going on though and the moisture that is to be in place in GA is quite deep and definately sufficent. This of course is always a concern with any setup.
 
IF THE INITIAL AREA OF RAINFALL BECOMES WIDESPREAD AND PERSISTENT...THERE WOULD BE A CHANCE THE SECOND PART OF THE SYSTEM COULD BE MUCH WEAKER BECAUSE OF THE STABILIZING AND COOLING EFFECTS OF THE RAINFALL. HOWEVER...LARGE HAIL MAY CONTINUE TO BE A THREAT IF THAT OCCURS. ON THE OTHER HAND...SOME OF THE WORST SEVERE WEATHER OUTBREAKS IN THE CAROLINAS AND GEORGIA HAVE OCCURRED WHEN A MORNING EPISODE PRECEDED THE MAIN ACTION LATER IN THE DAY.

I live half way between Athens, GA and Greenville, SC. Local forecasters here are getting VERY emphatic about the seriousness of this potential severe outbreak. THE BEST CHANCE OF SEVERE WEATHER FROM THE SECOND WAVE OF STORMS WILL LIKELY BE IN THE FOOTHILLS AND PIEDMONT OF GEORGIA AND SOUTH CAROLINA...TO THE SOUTHERN PIEDMONT IN NORTH CAROLINA.

I can't stress enough...don't try to chase NORTH of I-85, from Atlanta eastward. Far to hilly. My "Bullseye" will be Madison, Ga up to my home town of Seneca, SC. All in all, it looks like a good day, but I really hope the clouds break up and the rain subsides to allow some heating.

*****Looking at the new data that has just come out (1AM), my target area has plunged about 200 miles south. Macon, GA, and perhaps south and west of there.*****
 
NAM now seems to have a better handle on forecasted ongoing precipitations effects on instability. The Dryline looks very well defined coming into Alabama and a slight bulge is also showing up. Instability is quite strong in W-C AL, so best sceanrio is for a storm to fire there and move into the stronger helicity that is located in all areas East. By 21z both states have sufficent Helicity for Tornadic supercells. Though Georgia only averages about 500 j/kg SBCAPE, Alabama does 1-2k J/KG SBCAPE and 0-3km SRH 300+ SRH. . I still like the low level directional shear along the secondary warmfront, but forecasted cloud cover and SBCAPE could makes this area unattractive. A possible OFB forming Between FL/GA/AL in the morning could provide some extra helicity in the max heating area in AL.

Target: SW GA, some clearing in NE GA in the morning could be a big sign of things to come.

Good luck to all who are out tommorow, stay safe!
-Scott Olson.
 
Back
Top