Rich Thompson
EF3
The recent discussion about chasers, V2, etc. got me thinking about what it takes to become an "elite" chaser. I don't mean an "elitist" chaser, just one who tends to be more successful than most.
Here's my impression:
1. Intense interest in meteorology that may extend beyond tornadoes. It's clear you have to be passionate about the weather to be a really good chaser, and that passion drives your forecast ability. To be a great chaser you need to be at least a good forecaster, and you need to be motivated.
2. "Hopeless" optimist. This is an important attribute. Personally, I spend lots of time on the "cost-benefit analysis" such that I'm prone to skip days that end up being nice tornado producers. The very best chasers apply a cost-benefit analysis to the most marginal situations, but they don't let it stop them from chasing most days and most distances.
3. Available to chase. This also makes a great chaser. Chasing all the time helps fine-tune your decision making for those days when it matters most. It's also easier to live with the risk that goes along with aggressive targeting decisions when you know you'll have many opportunities to make up for any mistakes.
4. Aggressive and decisive. To win the prize you have to be willing to accept risk. The most successful chasers do this by not let hail cores, poor roads, distance, etc., stand in their way of tornadoes. They also don't let their own original forecasts stand in the way of changing targets when they need to change. Sometimes the aggressiveness is manifest as crazy driving (I certainly don't advocate this approach), but mostly it's the willingness to do what it takes to be successful.
Lastly, you could add 5) the ability to document the chase and share with others. A keen eye w.r.t. photos or video can really drive home your success, and it makes it much easier for others to believe you're good when you've got the images to show for it!
Assessing myself, I think I'm decent on 1), marginal on 2), poor on 3), and getting better on 4). I guess that makes me a middle-of-the-pack chaser, in line with my 5-10 tornadoes per year average. I've been working on 5), but I doubt I'll ever be better than the upper half of the pack.
Here's my impression:
1. Intense interest in meteorology that may extend beyond tornadoes. It's clear you have to be passionate about the weather to be a really good chaser, and that passion drives your forecast ability. To be a great chaser you need to be at least a good forecaster, and you need to be motivated.
2. "Hopeless" optimist. This is an important attribute. Personally, I spend lots of time on the "cost-benefit analysis" such that I'm prone to skip days that end up being nice tornado producers. The very best chasers apply a cost-benefit analysis to the most marginal situations, but they don't let it stop them from chasing most days and most distances.
3. Available to chase. This also makes a great chaser. Chasing all the time helps fine-tune your decision making for those days when it matters most. It's also easier to live with the risk that goes along with aggressive targeting decisions when you know you'll have many opportunities to make up for any mistakes.
4. Aggressive and decisive. To win the prize you have to be willing to accept risk. The most successful chasers do this by not let hail cores, poor roads, distance, etc., stand in their way of tornadoes. They also don't let their own original forecasts stand in the way of changing targets when they need to change. Sometimes the aggressiveness is manifest as crazy driving (I certainly don't advocate this approach), but mostly it's the willingness to do what it takes to be successful.
Lastly, you could add 5) the ability to document the chase and share with others. A keen eye w.r.t. photos or video can really drive home your success, and it makes it much easier for others to believe you're good when you've got the images to show for it!
Assessing myself, I think I'm decent on 1), marginal on 2), poor on 3), and getting better on 4). I guess that makes me a middle-of-the-pack chaser, in line with my 5-10 tornadoes per year average. I've been working on 5), but I doubt I'll ever be better than the upper half of the pack.