• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Vista considered harmful to photographers

Is XP even stable currently? No Blue screens, hold ups, etc?

-gerrit

I haven't had any crashes on my laptop with XP at all. Having said that, I still don't like it because there's just too much bloatware embedded in XP. Just another MS product that's an inefficient memory pig.

Now I'm seriously thinking of switching to Linux on the laptop and getting rid of the XP.

John
VE4 JTH
 
I haven't had any crashes on my laptop with XP at all. Having said that, I still don't like it because there's just too much bloatware embedded in XP. Just another MS product that's an inefficient memory pig.

Now I'm seriously thinking of switching to Linux on the laptop and getting rid of the XP.

John
VE4 JTH

I'm currently dual-booting Ubuntu linux and XP SP2. I gave brief thought to moving to all Linux (i.e. removing XP), but Linux can be such a pain in the butt sometimes. Fetch this library, ./make that, vim install.config something else. I still haven't had any luck getting my WPA2 wireless system in my house to work under Linux (supposedly, there are ways to get WPA to work, but they've all been unsuccessful for me, even after spending 4-5 hours trying to get it to work). Needless to say, I certainly won't be going "all Linux" anytime soon. I do like the dual-boot setup, however, since I have some work-related apps that only work on the Linux side (e.g. SoloII).

Unrelated to this, I chuckle when I read about some folks dogging Vista for being all about eye candy (neglecting some of the very important security changes and top-level changes to the kernel structure in Vista) and saying they are moving to Mac, an OS that has, for many years, been a lot more "pretty" and full of eye-candy than any MS OS. If Apple wasn't so dang controlling with their hardware, I'd consider it (building a Mac-machine isn't as much fun given the relative lack of hardware options/brands/models and the relatively steep price). But hey, that's a big reason why Mac OSs tend to be quite stable (if you keep a tight reign on the hardware your OS must address, it's much easier for your OS to behave properly). FWIW, I haven't had a non-self-inflicted crash in XP for years. <end rant>
 
Back
Top