Twitter/X revised TOS causing a stir

X updated their TOS to include a not-uncommon far-reaching rights grab for content and a mandatory inclusion in the platform’s AI training, among other things. It’s causing quite an uproar in the weather community.
I've enjoyed hearing lots of opinions. But, the point from the onset relates to the fact that there are those who desire to make income from their work, but don't want to get taken advantage of. Not trying to stir the pot, but it's not dismissible, trivial, or laughable; it's business.:)
 
Most people are NOT going to get rich on social media. Even with my massive content, it will never happen. Two age old business principles apply: be first and find a powerful niche backed with a ton of followers. Ryan Hall did a great job of capturing the live weather market and he does a good job. Reed Timmer found a niche by providing continuous, extreme coverage while building a massive audience. It's easy to go viral with a single video, but longevity and a massive, continious following is very difficult to achieve.
 
Last edited:
I'm still doing static-html web pages written in notepad. The only dynamic thing i use is PHP includes for the headers, footers and a few common elements. Some of my pages written in 1995 on monochrome Unix terminals still have some of their original code! A while ago I started including my busts/mediocre days in chase logs just to show how many times I have to go out to see something good. On my chase log pages, I have a "highlights" section that shows what I consider to be the "big catches" of the year, compare that with the number of chases in the next column. My hope is that it might help portray the "chasing life" in a realistic way.

Back to the money thing. I hope I'm not mischaracterizing this sentiment, but it seems that there is a vibe of "it's OK for big corporations and individuals to profit from *using* chaser footage, but problematic for the chaser *themselves* to". I had several pathways to a very good income that would have involved getting more IT certifications and working 9 to 5 in a cubicle (or data center) in the corporate world for most of my life. I turned them down. I wanted to live this "chasing life" that I have. If I just wanted money, I would have taken those paths in IT. I don't care about money in the sense that I'm trying to get on the S&P 500, but I do have rent, bills and I'd like to have a useful retirement fund. B&H requires money to buy my gear, the gas station requires money to fill my tank. I *have* to be concerned about money to that end. Beyond that, I don't care about being rich, famous or even popular. I'm certainly not any of those, and very content to stay that way.
 
Last edited:
There is absolutely nothing wrong with making money with the content obtained via chasing, and if you can get rich doing it, even better. Every video clip, every photo, or any other type of media captured in the process is the asset of the person who captured it and the marketplace should and will determine what the value of that asset is.

But, if you choose to put it out on social media, which is the path of choice for an overwhelming majority of chasers, you take on the risk of it being used in ways you can't predict or pre-determine and essentially grant a license of use to the social media site you post it on. But, being an asset to the person who captured it, it doesn't grant any license to any other individual to use. But, unfortunately they will use it (very illegally) and the person who owns the asset has to determine how far they'll go to protect it, because the social media sites themselves won't do it unless the asset is owned directly by them.

I watermark the crap out of my stuff, embed my photos against a blank white space and reduce the resolution to a point where it's mostly unusable, and I do expect it will be used by others to promote their pages, sites etc. that I wouldn't approve. I can't tell you how many times I see my photos used by other pages who I've never heard of. But I do my due diligence ahead of time and let most of them pass because what they're using mostly has no other value outside of promotion.

YT is a different beast I'm sure, but if I didn't want it to be used elsewhere (most wouldn't I'm sure) there'd be a big, wide, mostly transparent watermark across the video right in the middle that wouldn't intrude on a viewers experience. But, there'd be no mistake about who's it was if it was copied.
 
There is absolutely nothing wrong with making money with the content obtained via chasing, and if you can get rich doing it, even better. Every video clip, every photo, or any other type of media captured in the process is the asset of the person who captured it and the marketplace should and will determine what the value of that asset is.

But, if you choose to put it out on social media, which is the path of choice for an overwhelming majority of chasers, you take on the risk of it being used in ways you can't predict or pre-determine and essentially grant a license of use to the social media site you post it on. But, being an asset to the person who captured it, it doesn't grant any license to any other individual to use. But, unfortunately they will use it (very illegally) and the person who owns the asset has to determine how far they'll go to protect it, because the social media sites themselves won't do it unless the asset is owned directly by them.

I watermark the crap out of my stuff, embed my photos against a blank white space and reduce the resolution to a point where it's mostly unusable, and I do expect it will be used by others to promote their pages, sites etc. that I wouldn't approve. I can't tell you how many times I see my photos used by other pages who I've never heard of. But I do my due diligence ahead of time and let most of them pass because what they're using mostly has no other value outside of promotion.

YT is a different beast I'm sure, but if I didn't want it to be used elsewhere (most wouldn't I'm sure) there'd be a big, wide, mostly transparent watermark across the video right in the middle that wouldn't intrude on a viewers experience. But, there'd be no mistake about who's it was if it was copied.
This is where individuals, such as yourself and everyone you sir have followed since 2005 fall intro error. Money comes and money goes. The majority of storm chasers who have achieved such highs, myself inclided, have dived into the pit of "oh, why me... so let me complain on Twitter/X, etc" including many so called noteworthy personalities of "reality" television and "books" (research your sources), plunging them into such dire circumstances that you, Sean, have absolutely zero comprehension in beyond viewing videos on a social media platform or traditional network. Most people associated with such shows have passed away from death by tornado, drug addiction or suicide. That ain't pretty, nor do I pretend to gloss over that fact. Storm chasing for entertainment = nonsense. Beyond that, storm chasing = income, good luck, enjoy your life if that is what you shall choose. I write this not about a premiere photograph in a print magazine such as Life, nor sour grapes over a former colleague that has significant issues with addiction, control and hate for women. I'll pass on name dropping this time around. Get real! Yes, just let the sky documentation, reporting and observation be pure. Please cease this nonsense money train, which sir it is not. If you want to contribute something beyond generic weather video or hype to your social media accounts or bro forums that benefits the overall public consensus, sans media, then please do so beyond the gravy train of storm porn, weather lust and yes, greed. Once again, money ruins everything, and you sir are proof of it, just like the rest of your ilk. Please do attempt to convince me if I am in error of your viewpoint. I will meet it at the head! Trust me on that. Obviously in text form here, you may be able to tell I am driven and quite sincere on this topic of this thread, of which, I tire of your "type" of "copyright", of which you really don't own anything, "money" over atmosphere and education, and the aspect that you so push to the few individuals actually reading this newsgroup on a daily basis. Was that offensive? Good. Let the discussion begin. That is how civil discourse occurs, even on internet forums. Storm chasing, as a topic or hobby, matters nothing in the grand scheme of people or things. Sorry to disapoint you or burst the bubble. It's a fact. I'm the foremost expert on that, and yes, please do challenge me on that before Kate Carpenter writes her book on the topic ;0) Yes, this is absolutely a digital rant, and really, please do enjoy it, for it will not last. Nothing does. I am sincerely open to individual off forum comments. If you threaten me, don't you DARE tempt me, re: you will experience the verbal events of April 10, 1979 in SPS directly. Sean, if we ever encounter each other in reality, I will be quite professional and formal, but yet shall be firm, as you sir, are wrong on all accounts about money and weather... and in the end, it's about the sky, not your petty bank accounts.

Cheers.

Blake


BLAKE WILLIAM NAFTEL


Artist, Geoscientist, Writer
616.643.7762
blakenaftel.com
threereelfilms.com
newwaveweather.com (coming in 2025)
 
Last edited:
This is where individuals, such as yourself and everyone you sir have followed since 2005 fall intro error. Money comes and money goes. The majority of storm chasers who have achieved such highs, myself inclided, have dived into the pit of "oh, why me... so let me complain on Twitter/X, etc" including many so called noteworthy personalities of "reality" television and "books" (research your sources), plunging them into such dire circumstances that you, Sean, have absolutely zero comprehension in beyond viewing videos on a social media platform or traditional network. Most people associated with such shows have passed away from death by tornado, drug addiction or suicide. That ain't pretty, nor do I pretend to gloss over that fact. Storm chasing for entertainment = nonsense. Beyond that, storm chasing = income, good luck, enjoy your life if that is what you shall choose. I write this not about a premiere photograph in a print magazine such as Life, nor sour grapes over a former colleague that has significant issues with addiction, control and hate for women. I'll pass on name dropping this time around. Get real! Yes, just let the sky documentation, reporting and observation be pure. Please cease this nonsense money train, which sir it is not. If you want to contribute something beyond generic weather video or hype to your social media accounts or bro forums that benefits the overall public consensus, sans media, then please do so beyond the gravy train of storm porn, weather lust and yes, greed. Once again, money ruins everything, and you sir are proof of it, just like the rest of your ilk. Please do attempt to convince me if I am in error of your viewpoint. I will meet it at the head! Trust me on that. Obviously in text form here, you may be able to tell I am driven and quite sincere on this topic of this thread, of which, I tire of your "type" of "copyright", of which you really don't own anything, "money" over atmosphere and education, and the aspect that you so push to the few individuals actually reading this newsgroup on a daily basis. Was that offensive? Good. Let the discussion begin. That is how civil discourse occurs, even on internet forums. Storm chasing, as a topic or hobby, matters nothing in the grand scheme of people or things. Sorry to disapoint you or burst the bubble. It's a fact. I'm the foremost expert on that, and yes, please do challenge me on that before Kate Carpenter writes her book on the topic ;0) Yes, this is absolutely a digital rant, and really, please do enjoy it, for it will not last. Nothing does. I am sincerely open to individual off forum comments. If you threaten me, don't you DARE tempt me, re: you will experience the verbal events of April 10, 1979 in SPS directly. Sean, if we ever encounter each other in reality, I will be quite professional and formal, but yet shall be firm, as you sir, are wrong on all accounts about money and weather... and in the end, it's about the sky, not your petty bank accounts.

Cheers.

Blake


BLAKE WILLIAM NAFTEL


Artist, Geoscientist, Writer
616.643.7762
blakenaftel.com
threereelfilms.com
newwaveweather.com (coming in 2025)
While I appreciate your passion, you're kind of putting everyone in the same box. I don't speak for others or their experiences, and I don't disagree or even pretend to know what you've experienced. I only speak from what I know from my own experience.

You're correct, it is all about the sky. The sky is beautiful, it's ugly, it's angry sometimes. I read earlier that you were writing a comedy, and comedy can be the same way. I don't believe you shouldn't be able to pay the bills, or not make any spending money with your writing based off other's experience in writing, which I'm sure there are those who dealt with many of the same issues along the way.

Storm chasing is a passion, just like writing, or comedy, or mountain climbing or stamp collecting. There are some some really tough things that you see in storm chasing, and I've seen just about everything. But there are some beautiful things as well, and to paint everyone in chasing as entertainers would be a mistake, I do believe. I also believe that if one can turn their passion into a supplemental income, or even a living they should have the ability and right to do so.

You won't find me on Twitter/X, and if you do run into me out on the plains, you wouldn't know it because I stay pretty well hidden away from the crowds. Just earlier this year I was just across the gas pump in the Oklahoma panhandle from a regular here on the forum and they had no clue who I was and that they see my posts here on a regular basis. :) Yep, there are a few of us that don't have "Look at me!" syndrome.

I enjoy your posts and love that you're engaging here regularly. There's no way I could ever be offended by what you're posting. You're passionate about where you stand and I appreciate that. But, it works a lot better when the understanding goes both ways.
 
Last edited:
As alluded to earlier, I think it's fine that the rightful owners of the chasing material make some cheese but don't get cheated by others.
Occasionally people might need a motivation or a push to get outside to chase. And that income, no matter how large or small, may be the impetus to get back in the field to do it all over again. Because let's face it, many of us have done & seen and spent so much already.
Also, you never know when you'll get something very special. I'm thinking of the 2011 Joplin, MO tornado that blew up from a dusty whirl & strengthened into a massive EF-4 wedge in a few minutes. One of my former students, Scott Peake, got that video, and it made money for him.
 
Last edited:
While I appreciate your passion, you're kind of putting everyone in the same box. I don't speak for others or their experiences, and I don't disagree or even pretend to know what you've experienced. I only speak from what I know from my own experience.

You're correct, it is all about the sky. The sky is beautiful, it's ugly, it's angry sometimes. I read earlier that you were writing a comedy, and comedy can be the same way. I don't believe you shouldn't be able to pay the bills, or not make any spending money with your writing based off other's experience in writing, which I'm sure there are those who dealt with many of the same issues along the way.

Storm chasing is a passion, just like writing, or comedy, or mountain climbing or stamp collecting. There are some some really tough things that you see in storm chasing, and I've seen just about everything. But there are some beautiful things as well, and to paint everyone in chasing as entertainers would be a mistake, I do believe. I also believe that if one can turn their passion into a supplemental income, or even a living they should have the ability and right to do so.

You won't find me on Twitter/X, and if you do run into me out on the plains, you wouldn't know it because I stay pretty well hidden away from the crowds. Just earlier this year I was just across the gas pump in the Oklahoma panhandle from a regular here on the forum and they had no clue who I was and that they see my posts here on a regular basis. :) Yep, there are a few of us that don't have "Look at me!" syndrome.

I enjoy your posts and love that you're engaging here regularly. There's no way I could ever be offended by what you're posting. You're passionate about where you stand and I appreciate that. But, it works a lot better when the understanding goes both ways.
Sean, I can accept your perspective that I've placed "everyone" in the "same box" and that yes, on a internet forum such as Stormtrack, text, tone and direct statements can take the reader to a place that the author, in this case myself, did not specifically intend.

Everyone has a right to observe, pursue and document weather within reason. I too fully agree with you that "we" all need to and must "pay the bills" regardless of financial success or just in passing. I do indeed come off as sounding like an absolute hypocrite to say "money ruins everything", considering that I too have most certainly made a income on weather video over the years, be it in the corporate weather media enterprise, or freelance. I don't feel it's wrong to do so. I am strongly against many of the ways and means of how people obtain it however, i.e. excessive speeding, vehicular altercations, internet or social media hype, or just general disdain for each other in the field, at conferences or on forums such as this. The later is a very human trait that cannot be easily shifted, yet the former examples can.

My experiences on the 25-26-27 April 2024 in Kansas and Oklahoma was the clincher, for me at least, beyond the tornadoes observed, which put "everyone in the same box" in regards to storm chasing as an activity. While I still know and believe there are many responsible individuals whom are merely out for a host of experiences, interests and so fourth, individuals driving over 60+ mph on a gravel road, passing, tailing and then becoming annoyed at others whom are trying to be safe whilst in pursuit of severe weather is not right. I observed this happen, once directly to me, on multiple occasions on the 26-April 2024 in Southeast Kansas and again on the 27-April-2024 in Northern Oklahoma.

From my perspectives and experiences, the three days in the Plains and Midwest this past spring reminded me of large, black shirted moped or biker gangs, each and every individual, men, women and children all mentally bent on witnessing devastation to generate a internet stream, a profit, passive recognition, a tweet or perhaps some live media exposure. Media groups and individuals employed by them acted in a similar vein. It was disheartening to witness and directly experience, both as a professional meteorologist and long time storm observer. Personally, those experiences, which is not chronicled on this mini documentary of the events from those days, made the pursuit of severe weather in both the Sunflower and Sooner states very unenjoyable. Sure there were moments of solitude and peace, yet with every turn back on main or even side roads, groups of reckless individuals came of the woodwork at nearly each twist and turn of my adventures in 2024, and for me, that was the big signal to step away and gravitate towards comedy writing in an attempt to make weather funny as a profession.

To "circle back" as they love to say in the corporate weather industry ;) about money and storms, I did indeed gain a pittance of funds from The Weather Channel and ABC News post events in April and May, but that was hardly a profit and perhaps offset some tolls on the Turner Turnpike. There was a large part of me post tornadoes that had no interest in uploading video to network news feeds, exhausted from the days travels, and no longer on a deadline to get video to a producer ala the corporate weather crew days (i.e. AccuWeather), but there you have it. I too was part of the big weather money machine for a spark in time. Was that wrong? Sigh. Perhaps? Whatever money was generated, it's long gone, much like the atmospheric spectacles that generated it in the first place.

I stopped long ago attempting to "change" people or their perspectives about "storm chasing", as that is entirely on those individuals to self correct. Yet if my commentary, be it ludicrous, bizarre, educational or humorous, can offer anything to anyone out there, I will simply state that if one drives like you're a "star" in the "Fast and the Furious" film features, armored vehicles or not, merely to generate a social media following, profit and so forth, whether or not you need to "pay the bills", those people should have their heads examined, do some deep soul searching and realize causing someone else distress, potential injury (i.e. accidents) or worse is not worth it in the long run in the pursuit of air.

And with that, I'll hop off the Stormtrack soapbox. :)

Thank you for your perspectives, Sean and William! I meant no offense or to have my earlier statements read harsh. I merely just enjoy constructive debates and conversation such as what we are here.

All the best,

Blake


BLAKE WILLIAM NAFTEL

Artist, Geoscientist, Writer

616.643.7762
blakenaftel.com
threereelfilms.com
newwaveweather.com (coming in 2025)
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure I get the decoupling of money from chasing when chasing itself requires far more of it than the average hobby to participate at all. For a non-independently wealthy person such as myself, divesting the financial concerns from chasing means that I have to *quit* chasing. It's an issue of pragmatics,, not passion. All the passion in the world won't get you out there if you have no financial means to do it. At most, it means resign myself to the "Office Space" world of waking up at 6AM every day to put on a suit and tie and sit in a cubicle for most of my life, then eke out maybe a week or two in a short chase vacation every year. That's something I *would* do if I had a reason to (like if I had a family to support), but I don't. Why should I then accept that as the only moral path forward?

Does being "passionate about chasing" mean it's supposed to be a realm owned by only the independently wealthy who have the means to do it with no financial concerns, while the rest of us are morally obligated to relegate ourselves to being good little corporate slaves, wasting away in a windowless building staring at computer screens or Amazon warehouse with timed bathroom breaks?

I'd be more apt to concede any financial benefit from chasing if I didn't see the fruits of my work constantly enriching multi-billion dollar corporations and millionaire Youtubers. Most longtime veterans have at minimum licensed video to legacy media productions, and I'd estimate there are very few who wouldn't raise an eyebrow at a business taking their work without permission.

I'd agree that there are bad apples in the community where criticism is fair game, but in what way do they have anything to do with chasers like me? I've been solo for my entire career. Can anyone point to my body of work (all available to freely view on my site and Youtube channel) and allege that I've done anything to ruin the "purity" of the hobby? 90% of my work would not exist if I'd have been limited to short chase vacations while being shut in a cubicle. I'm not saying I'm without faults, but for most of my career, I've tried to help others in the community in various ways, like putting in tons of time contributing in trying to keep this site alive, standing up for the community in times of criticism, sharing my knowledge about chasing and trying to show others how corporations are exploiting us.
 
I'm not sure I get the decoupling of money from chasing when chasing itself requires far more of it than the average hobby to participate at all. For a non-independently wealthy person such as myself, divesting the financial concerns from chasing means that I have to *quit* chasing. It's an issue of pragmatics,, not passion. All the passion in the world won't get you out there if you have no financial means to do it. At most, it means resign myself to the "Office Space" world of waking up at 6AM every day to put on a suit and tie and sit in a cubicle for most of my life, then eke out maybe a week or two in a short chase vacation every year. That's something I *would* do if I had a reason to (like if I had a family to support), but I don't. Why should I then accept that as the only moral path forward?

Does being "passionate about chasing" mean it's supposed to be a realm owned by only the independently wealthy who have the means to do it with no financial concerns, while the rest of us are morally obligated to relegate ourselves to being good little corporate slaves, wasting away in a windowless building staring at computer screens or Amazon warehouse with timed bathroom breaks?

I'd be more apt to concede any financial benefit from chasing if I didn't see the fruits of my work constantly enriching multi-billion dollar corporations and millionaire Youtubers. Most longtime veterans have at minimum licensed video to legacy media productions, and I'd estimate there are very few who wouldn't raise an eyebrow at a business taking their work without permission.

I'd agree that there are bad apples in the community where criticism is fair game, but in what way do they have anything to do with chasers like me? I've been solo for my entire career. Can anyone point to my body of work (all available to freely view on my site and Youtube channel) and allege that I've done anything to ruin the "purity" of the hobby? 90% of my work would not exist if I'd have been limited to short chase vacations while being shut in a cubicle. I'm not saying I'm without faults, but for most of my career, I've tried to help others in the community in various ways, like putting in tons of time contributing in trying to keep this site alive, standing up for the community in times of criticism, sharing my knowledge about chasing and trying to show others how corporations are exploiting us.
As the oft utilized broad brush millennial phrase goes, you do you, Dan! ;)

Nobody is telling you to put on a tie and eek out a gerbil on a wheel style "Office Space" existence in a cubicle for a corporate oligarch with multiple wives, yachts, rocket farms and estates. Those themes would offer up a successful comedy film or television series. Oh wait! That's already happened! But I do get your point/s noted, nor am I in any attempt to be hyper critical on you specifically, Dan.

To each our own! Let's just all be respectful to one another while in hot pursuit of convective air, or in my case, helium.

Blake


BLAKE WILLIAM NAFTEL


Artist, Geoscientist, Writer

616.643.7762
blakenaftel.com
threereelfilms.com
newwaveweather.com (coming in 2025)
 
My experiences on the 25-26-27 April 2024 in Kansas and Oklahoma was the clincher, for me at least, beyond the tornadoes observed, which put "everyone in the same box" in regards to storm chasing as an activity. While I still know and believe there are many responsible individuals whom are merely out for a host of experiences, interests and so fourth, individuals driving over 60+ mph on a gravel road, passing, tailing and then becoming annoyed at others whom are trying to be safe whilst in pursuit of severe weather is not right. I observed this happen, once directly to me, on multiple occasions on the 26-April 2024 in Southeast Kansas and again on the 27-April-2024 in Northern Oklahoma.

I agree some of it is fraught with danger to everyone else when someone is driven to capture the content to achieve those funds. I and many others have experienced this. Last year I was in Missouri on the southern edge of a tornado warned storm and had someone riding my tailgate within a few feet because they were either freaking out, or in a hurry to get ahead and I finally had to stick my arm out the window and signal for them to back off. Not to mentioned me trying to navigate this storm on winding back roads. I was very irritated and they knew I wasn't happy about it.

There are so many other incidents like this I think we can all tell a story or ten.

Personally, after spending plenty of time in the Bears Cage or close to it, I've opted for a more relaxing chase (again, away from the crowds) and a little further back, but just close enough to not miss the show if I can help it. I started streaming on YouTube last year, but decided it wasn't for me because it brought so much pressure to "get the shot" and I found myself doing things that put me in situations I'd never find myself in otherwise. (Lost windshields, punching hail cores, speeding, etc). I'll wholeheartedly agree that the temptation of money can change someone's mindset in certain instances as I just mentioned.

These days there are a variety of ways to bring in revenue and not all of them involve nefarious activities. The temptation to make those funds are real, the question is does the individual have enough control over themselves to do it safely.
 
...gravitate towards comedy writing in an attempt to make weather funny as a profession....To "circle back" as they love to say...
Prolific & timely video has occasionally kept me from venturing out, because I knew ardent chasers will deliver the watchable goods! 🤓 But...
Remember when meteorology on tv was kinda funny, with a joking David Letterman as a bumbling weather-caster, & bimbos in tight sweaters that read the NWS feed but didn't truly know what they were talking about? That has largely changed, except the sweaters, but we can still joke.😆
 
Last edited:
Prolific & timely video has occasionally kept me from venturing out, because I knew ardent chasers will deliver the watchable goods! 🤓 But...
Remember when meteorology on tv was kinda funny, with a joking David Letterman as a bumbling weather-caster, & bimbos in tight sweaters that read the NWS feed but didn't truly know what they were talking about? That has largely changed, except the sweaters, but we can still joke.😆
I always loved the "satellite border" controversy clip regarding Indiana and Ohio as "one gigantic state" from 1974. Dave almost continued his television weather career after being fired from WLWI, now WTHR 13, at KSTP 5 in MSP, but then went head on into comedy. I seem to recall him saying that the "salary was so poor" at KSTP that it's partially what disused him from continuing in TV weather as a career.

Weather broadcasting in balance is mostly a mix of technical information, some "Mr./Ms. Wizard" type science, entertainment and information that informs the public. It's not about hyper color graphics or up talking potential events that have not happened yet. There is a fine line. Those who are stellar at it in delivery find their dance, and have been quite successful at it.

When I interviewed for a full time weather producer position at KWTV CBS 9 in Oklahoma City with Gary England in June 2005, I was asked point blank, in Gary's classic Oklahoma vocal drawl that I can do a spot on impression of now, "Blake, how would you tell a weather story if it's sunny and hot outside?" I just went blank for a moment, then came back with something along the lines of "I'd deliver spiky yellow balls of happiness to the Okies from Muskogee." ☀️ I didn't get that job, of which I really did want at the time, that in turn went to some blonde women who was a fresh graduate out of OU, however the connection and rapport between Gary and I along with a mixed sense of humor opened doors that year and in the decades that followed.

Weather + humor = the atmospheres of human nature. Of which is the tag line for "THE WEATHER CREW ™" comedy hour. 😀

Blake


BLAKE WILLIAM NAFTEL

Artist, Geoscientist, Writer

616.643.7762
blakenaftel.com
threereelfilms.com
newwaveweather.com (coming in 2025)
 
Last edited:
I agree some of it is fraught with danger to everyone else when someone is driven to capture the content to achieve those funds. I and many others have experienced this. Last year I was in Missouri on the southern edge of a tornado warned storm and had someone riding my tailgate within a few feet because they were either freaking out, or in a hurry to get ahead and I finally had to stick my arm out the window and signal for them to back off. Not to mentioned me trying to navigate this storm on winding back roads. I was very irritated and they knew I wasn't happy about it.

There are so many other incidents like this I think we can all tell a story or ten.

Personally, after spending plenty of time in the Bears Cage or close to it, I've opted for a more relaxing chase (again, away from the crowds) and a little further back, but just close enough to not miss the show if I can help it. I started streaming on YouTube last year, but decided it wasn't for me because it brought so much pressure to "get the shot" and I found myself doing things that put me in situations I'd never find myself in otherwise. (Lost windshields, punching hail cores, speeding, etc). I'll wholeheartedly agree that the temptation of money can change someone's mindset in certain instances as I just mentioned.

These days there are a variety of ways to bring in revenue and not all of them involve nefarious activities. The temptation to make those funds are real, the question is does the individual have enough control over themselves to do it safely.

This year I arrived to an epiphany whilst driving back to Michigan, unaware of the events that would quickly follow on 7 May 2024, that I simply did not find the activity enjoyable anymore. It's much a kin to how a lot in life plays out. Pick your topic, career, relationship, hobby, etc. If it's not "fun" anymore nor is providing any form of a public service that is of benefit to others, be it educational, creatively and so fourth, that's a big signal to make a shift.

I was and still remain inspired by travel, geographic and atmospheric features, but not the "draw" or "temptation" of the financial side. When I roam the long and winding roads of the United States, or I should say, when I did, as I'm fairly parked in the Windy City at the moment focused on comedy, the natural sights, aromas and spectacles were always the keynote feature. Technology distractions, even if part of a job, be it getting a tweet out, a Facebook post, raising an ENG telescopic mast, SNG dish or LiveU cellular live shot/stream up to broadcast certainly worked up the adrenaline, and perhaps was of benefit to a small section of viewers, but that pulled away from my inner joy as to why I was out there chronicling weather in the first place.

Never did the YouTube live streams, nor see myself doing so. I've had my fill of wall to wall, back to back and tease up this n' that media content. The positive, I am fortunate and thankful for all of those experiences, good, mediocre and bad, along with the moments working as a tour guide and forecaster for Tempest Tours in the 2000's. All of my past now serves up as comedic snapshots for myself and other sketch artists, writers and comedians to parody. ;)

Great discussion, Sean!

Blake


BLAKE WILLIAM NAFTEL


Artist, Geoscientist, Writer

616.643.7762
blakenaftel.com
threereelfilms.com
newwaveweather.com (coming in 2025)
 
Back
Top