Skip Talbot
EF5
In the off season I've been experimenting with time lapse photography. In the past I would usually just run my camcorder for a few hours and then speed the video up in the editor. To get a lot more control over the editing, and a sharper and much higher resolution image, I'm making the switch over to using my DSLR. Here are the first few off season attempts:
All of these were shot on a Canon 60D with an EF-S 10-22mm
July 14 aurora borealis:
Watch video >
The first sequence was 30" exposures, 10 mm, f/3.5 at ISO 800. I noticed the exposures were too long, the motion of the bands blurring the details of the spikes so for the later sequences I shot at 15" and ISO 1600 I believe.
August 3 sunset over Lake Michigan from Grand Haven, MI:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqeNF64ojCs
I shot bursts of three photos on a 10 second interval at f/3.5 and ISO 100 varying the shutter speed between 1/250, 1/500, and 1/1000. 900 frames total were merged together in post processing for 300 final frames to produce an HDR video. In hindsight I'd shoot longer exposures to smooth out some of the wave motion. The HDR process introduced a bit of a flicker too. Running the video through a deflicker filter should help and I may try that on future time lapses.
August 10 dawn convection over Lake Michigan from Wind Point, WI:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSXPmFbxBMI
The first sequence is bursts of three on a 10 second interval again, but I wanted longer exposures this time so I did f/13 ISO 100. I also wanted two stops between frames so the shutter speeds were 0.8, 1/5, and 1/20. The waves are quite a bit smoother here. The backlit blue clouds on white sky were difficult to process aesthetically. The second sequence is at f/13 ISO 100 and 1/100 exposures, not varying the shutter speed for just 450 total frames at a 2 second interval. A woman walked in front of my shot at the end, and I did a hasty job removing her from the frames by pasting over her from sections of previous frames. You can see a glitch at the end where the pasted sections don't line up. I could probably get that to look pretty natural if I spent more time on it.
All of these were shot on a Canon 60D with an EF-S 10-22mm
July 14 aurora borealis:
Watch video >
The first sequence was 30" exposures, 10 mm, f/3.5 at ISO 800. I noticed the exposures were too long, the motion of the bands blurring the details of the spikes so for the later sequences I shot at 15" and ISO 1600 I believe.
August 3 sunset over Lake Michigan from Grand Haven, MI:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqeNF64ojCs
I shot bursts of three photos on a 10 second interval at f/3.5 and ISO 100 varying the shutter speed between 1/250, 1/500, and 1/1000. 900 frames total were merged together in post processing for 300 final frames to produce an HDR video. In hindsight I'd shoot longer exposures to smooth out some of the wave motion. The HDR process introduced a bit of a flicker too. Running the video through a deflicker filter should help and I may try that on future time lapses.
August 10 dawn convection over Lake Michigan from Wind Point, WI:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSXPmFbxBMI
The first sequence is bursts of three on a 10 second interval again, but I wanted longer exposures this time so I did f/13 ISO 100. I also wanted two stops between frames so the shutter speeds were 0.8, 1/5, and 1/20. The waves are quite a bit smoother here. The backlit blue clouds on white sky were difficult to process aesthetically. The second sequence is at f/13 ISO 100 and 1/100 exposures, not varying the shutter speed for just 450 total frames at a 2 second interval. A woman walked in front of my shot at the end, and I did a hasty job removing her from the frames by pasting over her from sections of previous frames. You can see a glitch at the end where the pasted sections don't line up. I could probably get that to look pretty natural if I spent more time on it.
Last edited by a moderator: