Michael Towers
Supporter
I find it interesting and somewhat amusing that language used in a SWODY at times resembles those from a chaser’s perspective. I would think that when describing an “area of concern†the forecaster would be discussing something relating to the increasing of severe potential, but many times the “area of concern†relates to a factor that would diminish prospects for severe potential. The chaser or storm enthusiast mentality can be observed in text such as “an area of concern is a strong cap but diurnal heating accompanied by advection of LL moisture should increase SBCAPE to 2500 J/KG and if timing of advancing dryline coincides with strongest heating Deep Layer Shear of 60 Kt will be sufficient for Supercells to develop…†Shouldn’t it be the other way around? “A strong cap may prohibit convective development but an area of concern will be SBCAPE values increasing to 2500 J/KG accompanied by an advancing dryline…†Personally I like the enthusiast mentality but is that approach the proper one? Shouldn’t a forecast for the public be framed where the concern is for severe development vs. concern against it?