• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

"Professional" storm chaser LSR

I noticed that too . . . thought it was rather odd. Maybe they told the person logging the report that they were professional chasers and the logger just typed it in. Or maybe they were TV news chasers. Oooh, I wanna be a professional too!
 
Yeah... guys.

I just got signed on to a 5-yr, $50 million contract, plus a signing bonus of another $5 million. It's great being a professional!

:)
 
I would imagine that this is the case being referred to (from the 6/6 TALK thread):
Originally posted by Bill Hark
I just heard from Charles Edwards of Cloud 9 Tours at 7:25 EDT. He is filming a white stovepipe tornado 5 miles north of Arthur, Nebraska in Arthur County. That's north of Ogalla. Not much else in htat area. Congrats to Charles!!

If your definition of "Pro" is getting paid to do something, then I suppose a tour company owner/employee qualify as professional chasers, as would somebody who is getting paid to do research, etc. like a Tim Samaras. In chasing, however, "Pro" does not necessarily indicate "professional conduct" (as we saw from the "F5 Tornado Safari tour" guys in this thread) nor does it mean that their skills are necessarily better than an experienced amateur. If your definition of "pro" is that you derive all of your income from chasing, then I doubt there are many in that category.

Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
Girls only want guys with great SKILLS. You know. . . Nunchuk skills, bow-hunting skills, computer hacking skills, storm chasing skills . . .
 
I don't really know the definition of a "professional storm chaser", but I know numerous mets consider themselves "professional spotters", and that is how they're referred to in the LSR...
 
Professional storm chaser

So if your a chaser who gets paid your a professional? Then I guess I'm a professional because besides chasing storms as an obsessive hobby I also chase storms for KWWL Channel 7 and get paid 50$ to more than
100$ for good storm footage (made a quick 50$ on 05/05/06 for some shelf cloud footage I shot in Bremer County Iowa) Feels good to be a highly paid professional chaser...LOL :lol: Where are my personal STALKERS/fan clubs? LOL :D
 
To me, a professional storm chaser is one that derives a large portion of their income from chasing. There are very few in that category. I would include tour group operators such as Charles Edwards and Jim Leonard, chaser/photojournalists (Warren Faidley comes to moind) and maybe some of the chasers hired by local television stations. I think the list is fairly short.

Bill Hark
 
Dean Cosgrove was out there two and as far as Dean or Charles being called Pro's, well yes they are.

I would imagine that this is the case being referred to (from the 6/6 TALK thread):
I just heard from Charles Edwards of Cloud 9 Tours at 7:25 EDT. He is filming a white stovepipe tornado 5 miles north of Arthur, Nebraska in Arthur County. That's north of Ogalla. Not much else in htat area. Congrats to Charles!!

If your definition of "Pro" is getting paid to do something, then I suppose a tour company owner/employee qualify as professional chasers, as would somebody who is getting paid to do research, etc. like a Tim Samaras. In chasing, however, "Pro" does not necessarily indicate "professional conduct" (as we saw from the "F5 Tornado Safari tour" guys in this thread) nor does it mean that their skills are necessarily better than an experienced amateur. If your definition of "pro" is that you derive all of your income from chasing, then I doubt there are many in that category.

Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
Girls only want guys with great SKILLS. You know. . . Nunchuk skills, bow-hunting skills, computer hacking skills, storm chasing skills . . .
 
Back
Top