-
While Stormtrack has discontinued its hosting of SpotterNetwork support on the forums, keep in mind that support for SpotterNetwork issues is available by emailing [email protected].
Poor Media Use of Weather Terminology
- Thread starter Jeff Duda
- Start date
JamesCaruso
Staff member
“The tornado did not leave behind any observable damage, so it's considered an EF-U, for unknown intensity.”
www.wflx.com
Never heard this term before. If there’s no damage isn’t it an EF-0?!?
NWS confirms EF-U tornado in Pahokee on Thursday afternoon
WPTV Meteorologist Sami Squires says the National Weather Service (NWS) confirmed a "short-lived" twister in Pahokee around 3:45 p.m.
Never heard this term before. If there’s no damage isn’t it an EF-0?!?
EF-U is a fairly recent thing, I think the idea was with a EF-0 there will be very minor damage (basically enough "damage" to show something moved through - the type of thing that scatters stuff around on the ground and maybe takes off some small twigs & leaves.. but no meaningful damage to anything), where EF-U is 'nothing found'.
EF-U is an underutilized option in the EF scale. It has been around since 2007, the implementation of the EF scale. Actually, tornadoes that don't produce any obvious damage (i.e., remain over open land without trees or structures, so...a lot of plains tornadoes) should be getting rated EFU. It's just that a lot of NWS personnel are probably more familiar with the older policies and so continued to rate such tornadoes as EF0, against the recommendation in the EF scale.
Randy Zipser
EF3
The local NWS office is expected to conduct a field damage survey following any event in which Doppler radar had indicated a continuous, well-defined TVS or "debris ball" signature, especially if any public/storm chaser reports were phoned in or submitted online during the event. Therefore, since a field survey is routinely conducted, the results will likely be reported as EF-0 if little or no detectable ground damage is visible. The NWS would probably not use the EF-U designation, as that might give the impression that no survey was done at all.
An example of where the EF-U designation might be appropriate is when a tornado occurs during the night over a sparcely-populated forest, where no one is around to observe (or hear) it. How does one rate accurately fallen or snapped-off trees, as they all look pretty-much alike? However, if some of the trees are debarked in some locations and not others, this might suggest the presence of suction vortices with higher windspeeds at the ground. In that scenario, a numerical EF rating might be justified.
An example of where the EF-U designation might be appropriate is when a tornado occurs during the night over a sparcely-populated forest, where no one is around to observe (or hear) it. How does one rate accurately fallen or snapped-off trees, as they all look pretty-much alike? However, if some of the trees are debarked in some locations and not others, this might suggest the presence of suction vortices with higher windspeeds at the ground. In that scenario, a numerical EF rating might be justified.
Similar threads
