Mike Peregrine
EF5
Sounds like a variety of factors are throwing several models into confusion in the long range, resulting in some wild inconsistencies. GGEM appears a little more stable at least for now, pointing to a potential breakup of our not-so-friendly ridge and allowing for a boundary to set up shop from Colorado through the central plains after the 29th. Hopefully the impulses riding this feature will provide enough UMPH to get something going. Still not the powerhouse setup we normally see this time of year, but a zonal regime at least gets us somewhere back in the ballpark of where we would like to be, and would hopefually at least allow for something chaseable. I don't normally like looking this far ahead, but it's all we've got for now.
GEM 84 hr:
http://meteocentre.com/models/glb00_84_e.html
96 hr:
http://meteocentre.com/models/glb00_96_e.html
108 hr:
http://meteocentre.com/models/glb00_108_e.html
GEM 84 hr:
http://meteocentre.com/models/glb00_84_e.html
96 hr:
http://meteocentre.com/models/glb00_96_e.html
108 hr:
http://meteocentre.com/models/glb00_108_e.html