• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

NWS explains no warning before Northeast MO tornado

Jesse Risley

Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
2,273
Location
Macomb, IL
CLARK COUNTY, Mo. (WGEM) -

The National Weather Service explained why a warning wasn't issued earlier this week when a tornado ripped through northeast Missouri.

There was significant damage to property in Clark County following the EF-2 tornado Monday night. The Missouri Department of Transportation's facilities near Wayland were also damaged.

NWS Meteorologist Donna Dubberke who is based in the Quad Cities said they certainly missed the tornado. She said there wasn't enough information on their radar and not enough clear data to issue a tornado warning.

Dubberke said it was dark and difficult for spotters to see, and fast moving, so there were issues identifying the storm.

"We do case studies after the fact so we can learn about it and take the damage track and put it directly over the radar and go back and look at the full storm and learn from it," Dubberke said. "So the next time we will have a clue beforehand rather than not knowing until after."

Dubberke said they are discussing future training options at NWS and in the community to make sure something like this doesn't happen again.

She added that warnings are issued for 70 percent of tornadoes. This was one that fell in the 30 percent of misses.

http://www.wgem.com/story/37010924/2017/12/06/nws-explains-no-warning-before-nemo-tornado
 
It crossed right in front of me and I didn't even realize there was a tornado on the ground. There were several other chasers in the area on various angles of the storm, and all anyone could confirm was a wall cloud about 5 minutes prior to the tornado touching down. The radar signatures were not overly impressive, BUT this region is arguably one of the most notable "radar holes" east of the Rockies relative to the population of the area in the "hole" and the risk of severe weather due to its favorable location in the central Corn Belt.
 
Also a pretty difficult situation given the time of year. Tornadoes in northeast Missouri are next to unheard of in December. Very climatologically unfavorable.
 
Back
Top