• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Kentucky and other mesonets

Joined
Dec 10, 2003
Messages
303
Although it's of limited utility to most storm chasers, the Kentucky Mesonet is now going online.

There is also a mesonet in Utah (and apparently additional obs for other mountain west states) and one in the works for North Carolina.

University of Missouri's Extension Commercial Agriculture Program with Mizzou and SLU's meteorology departments have been slowly building a Missouri mesonet since the early 1990s, but the stations that are in place aren't yet providing available data in (near) real-time. Texas A&M is also working toward a mesonet for parts of that state.

These complement the well-known and highly useful mesonets of Oklahoma, West Texas, and Iowa. I don't know of any others with publicly available near real-time data (various utilities, DOTs, and other institutions operate proprietary networks such as "QuantumWeather" for eastern Missouri and the St. Louis metro). Interestingly, Japan's standard surface network has a tighter spacing than our densest mesonets (excluding micronets like OKC) at 17 km. The explosion of private weather stations and availability of their data on the internet continues, but I focus on standardized formal networks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Indeed, the Kentucky mesonet itself may be of little use to great plains chasers, but mesonets like the Kentucky one, as well as the Oklahoma, and West Texas one, and to some extent, the Iowa one, have some great data to observe, data that you won't find anywhere else. This data is usually of high quality, and of high temporal resolution, thus making it possible to observe weather phenomena on scales smaller than that offered by the ASOS/AWOS network for surface data.
 
Back
Top