Stan Rose
EF5
I have to say that I mostly agree with this point of view. Don't get me wrong, I admire Reed Timmer as a forecaster, and he gets great video. No argument there at all. He is out there living his dream and having a good time with it, and I have to say there are probably many on this board (myself included) who would love to be in his shoes.
What I do take exception to however, are the claims that it is all done in the name of science. Reed Timmer is in the business of selling dramatic video, end of story. He is an exceptional marketer, and boatloads of toy rockets, quadcopter drones or any other toys thrown into tornadoes add to the drama of good footage, but the likelihood of these endeavors ever contributing to our understanding of severe weather is very remote.
The personal motivations that draw chasers out to the plains every year are as varied as the chasers themselves, but I have always believed in being on the level. I love science, sure, but that's not why I chase. I chase for the awesomeness of the storm, and the thrill of seeing what the atmosphere is capable of when it gets attitude.
My belief is that the "key" to unlocking the mystery of the tornado (if there really is such a thing) is currently hidden in the mountains of data that have already been gleaned from field efforts like VORTEX and others like it. All that is needed is for someone out there to put the pieces of the puzzle together.
John
VE4 JTH
That's the quote I have yet to see being made. But maybe Im just missing it. When you're in the business of documenting something that is making a lot of people's lives miserable, there is a certain expectation (by the public) that you are doing something to counter that negative aspect. So, it could be partly a rationalization that you are out there partly to "save lives" through increased understanding etc. That doesn't really seem that horrendous to me. But as for the claim it is "all" in the name of science, like i said, I must be missing it...