Bill Hark
EF5
Well, that was useless. The CES 2021 is over, and I couldn't find any new camcorders that were announced.
I switched a few years ago from separate camcorder and DLSR to a Nikon DLSR that can also take video. I used to try to juggle the two, and decided it was just more of a distraction that was taking me out of the moment. It’s already hard enough to balance the choice of just watching vs capturing, let alone two different modes of capture with two different devices. There are still some inefficiencies in switching between modes, and holding the camera for video is a little cumbersome, but it’s still better than fumbling around with two different pieces of equipment. Less to carry with me too, considering I’m a chase vacationer that has to fly out with luggage and equipment. Not sure about going with just a phone though, at least on the iPhone I know the video zoom is not very powerful and even less powerful than the phone’s still photo zoom.
Jim, Do you know what model of Nikon DLSR you were using? I'm looking into those now. Thanks!
Hi Mark,
Its the D5300. Quite a number of years ago that I bought it, I’m sure there are much better versions/technologies now, even on the used market.
My thinking has changed somewhat since my post that you quoted, where I said I wouldn’t want to go with just an iPhone. That’s still literally true, I wouldn’t want to have *only* an iPhone, but when I chased alone for the first time in 2021 I realized how valuable it is to be able to video one-handed with the iPhone. Taking video with the DLSR is a cumbersome, 2-handed exercise. I am hoping to get one of the newer iPhones and will probably weigh camera/video functionality much more than in previous iPhone upgrades that were primarily business-driven decisions.
So, the thread still getting bumped three years after I started it really says something about how bleak the market is! Figure I should give a quick update, since I caved last spring and chose what I determined to be my least bad option for 4K/modern video.
This is going to sound comically dumb to mirrorless gurus, but I ended up with:
What's really dumb about this: the lens is for APS-C (aka 1.5x crop) and does not take advantage of the full-frame sensor. So why did I end up with the A7r ii? Well, it was about the same price as newer Sony crop bodies that shared the A7r's in-body stabilization, which I really wanted for video. (To be clear, the A7r series features "Super 35" mode for video, where only the APS-C subset of the sensor is used).
- A used Sony A7r ii (~$900)
- Sony E PZ 18-105mm G f/4 OS
This setup ran me about the same as the mid-range Sony 4K camcorders, but it gives me substantially better low light performance... at the expense of ergonomics and size. I was attracted to the 18-105 because of its wide focal range and its power zoom feature, which at least allows me to zoom smoothly during video like a camcorder if needed.
Using it last spring was a learning experience, and I totally flubbed focus for portions of every tornado I saw. Still, I think I'm reasonably happy with it... I just need to practice focusing more before next season arrives. A couple samples shot with this setup:
Vernon storm:
Sudan/Earth storm:
In theory, I could get a Nikon F adaptor and use the lens lineup I'm already using for stills on the A7r ii, but I haven't messed with that yet. Honestly, I'm now stuck with the same paralysis about where to go next with my gear for stills as I was with video a couple years ago... but that's for another thread.