• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

8/19 Central Kansas Tornadoes Assessment

Joined
Dec 9, 2003
Messages
4,839
Location
Oklahoma
From a damage assessment from the ICT NWSFO, there were 5 confirmed tornadoes in and around the Great Bend area yesterday (Friday)... http://kamala.cod.edu/offs/KICT/0508201849.nous43.html

+ 8 mi W of Great Bend -- brief touchdown in field -- F0

+ SW of Great Bend -- brief touchdown -- F0

+ 5 mi NE of Great Bend -- 4 mile path length -- F1

+ 1 mi S of Bushton -- brief touchdown -- presumably F0

+ 4 mi SW of Geneseo -- brief touchdown -- presumably F0

I don't have any radar images stored, but the velocity images from KICT radar of this storm were very impressive. Now, the most interesting part of the PNS, IMO:

THE SECOND BRIEF TORNADO WAS TOUCHED DOWN SOUTHWEST OF GREAT BEND, AND LIFTED AS IT APPROACHED THE AIRPORT. IT WAS ALSO RATED A F0. AT 414 PM, 74 MPH WINDS WERE MEASURED AT THE AIRPORT. EXTENSIVE DAMAGE TO THE HANGERS AT THE AIRPORT WAS OBSERVED. THIS THUNDERSTORM TRACKED ACROSS THE CITY OF GREAT BEND, AND PRODUCED A THREE BLOCK WIDE SWATH OF EXTENSIVE TREE DAMAGE. MUCH OF THE STRUCTURAL DAMAGE
IN GREAT BEND WAS A RESULT OF FALLING LIMBS AND TREES. THERE WAS ALSO A REPORT FROM A STORM CHASER LOCATED IN GREAT BEND WHO MEASURED 114 MPH WINDS FOR 93 SECONDS.

I haven't heard a firsthand report of these winds, so I assume that it was nobody on this board that measured the 114mph winds for 93 seconds. I assume those winds were associated with the RFD given the proximity of the damage described relative to the meso (or at least where the tornado was located)... Anyone know who the chaser is? That's some remarkable non-tornadic winds, especially when measured (I assume on an on-vehicle anemometer).
 
Back
Top