JamesCaruso
Staff member
The thing I wish I was better at is picking up on storms like the one east of Enid. The storm far away from everything in a spot no one was looking at, with zero (non-local) chasers on it. There's always one of those somewhere. Looking at mesoanalysis now, it's pretty obvious, but why isn't anyone up there? At least I'm apparently not alone in that deficiency.
Great question that deserves its own thread.
I didn’t have time to look at the situation. When you say it was obvious from mesoanalysis, how far in advance of the event was it evident? Could it have been reasonably forecasted, or was it a later, unanticipated evolution?
I think part of it is an anchoring bias initially - multiple sources focused on a more synoptically evident area, so deeper analysis is focused on that area to the exclusion of others. Then it becomes confirmation bias, zooming in on the favorable factors in that region.
Then once you’re physically in that original area, the bias really locks in to stay put and avoid driving hours to a new spot - especially for a night chase, in this case.





