• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

2020-08-10 NE/IA/IL/WI/IN/MI: EVENT

Dean Baron

Supporter
Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Messages
573
Location
Minneapolis, MN
The NWS- Quad Cities has released new storm damage data for the derecho on 8/10/20. The new data suggests winds may have reached 140 mph based on damage to an apartment building near Cedar Rapids, IA. New storm reports have been added to the SPC storm reports for a recorded wind gust of 126 mph in Atkins, IA. A 340 foot tall antenna which was rated to withstand winds of 125 mph was also toppled near Van Horne, IA.

Here is a link to the news story about this new storm data.

Here is a link to pictures of the damaged apartment building mentioned above.

I don't think any of us can picture a squall line producing winds of 140 mph. I've never heard of one coming anywhere close to that strength. To me this begs this question, was this the most powerful MCS/derecho on record?
 
Yesterday it was noted that there was a 400 foot communications tower downed in Clinton County where I was chasing last Monday, which was done by a wind gust close to 130 mph. I've spoke to several friends from DVN and they have told me this is the most intense derecho they have EVER seen or heard of. It basically produced a near continuous swath of 100+ mph winds (with areas of 120-140 mph) from Story County, IA east to the Mississippi River near Clinton County Iowa (over 130 miles long and perhaps even longer).

Edit: My apologies for posting in the report thread, thought it was the event thread, oops!
 
Last edited:

I skimmed the summaries, so I may have missed something

May 31, 1994 had a 140 mph gust in Utah

Several derechos with max gusts between 125-135

Several others with winds estimated between 112-157 mph but I think that may have just been damage surveys that happened to find damage similar to EF-2 tornado wind strength

IMO this deserves its own topic
 
Back
Top