• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

2024-06-22 EVENT: IA/WI/IL

Joined
Oct 10, 2004
Messages
1,436
Location
Madison, WI
Been monitoring Saturday 6/22 for local/regional chase potential for a few days now, signal has been there on the models but for most of the time nothing jumped out as particularly impressive. However, multiple 0Z CAMS (HRRR, 3KM NAM and HRW-FV3) tonight have shown rather potent solutions with some combination of discrete supercells and a potential derecho-producing MCS affecting portions of the titular Midwest states tomorrow afternoon/evening.

Positives appear to include generally stronger deep-layer speed and directional shear than we've seen with most of the "setups" thus far this June; and quite rich moisture.

Negatives are mediocre lapse rates (generally 6-6.5 degrees C/km at all levels) and a potentially complex surface pattern regarding where the best focus for supercell tornado potential will set up. The synoptic warm front is an obvious player, but there will likely be multiple outflow boundaries in play given multiple rounds of storms in the vicinity tonight and tomorrow morning. Of course, that's to be expected with most setups and even more so by late June.

Preliminary target is somewhere along a Waverly-Tama, IA line; unless more CAM solutions (other than the 0Z 3KM NAM) begin to converge on the idea of discrete supercells in southern Wisconsin.
 
I think there is some potential there. The challenge is that the cold front is likely to quickly sweep any cells into a line.

As of this morning's runs the models disagree about quickly the convection clears out of Wisconsin, so targeting Iowa makes sense - I would probably target a similar area to you, maybe a little more east.

RST
 
Back
Top