• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

2018-05-12 EVENT: MO/IL/IN/OH

Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
3,447
Location
St. Louis
An east-west stationary front is shown by both NAM and GFS as settling in from the MO/IA border east into Ohio and even Pennsylvania as several ripples in the mostly zonal midlevels bring 30-50 knots of flow and effective shear values of 40+kts over the entire length of this boundary from the eastern Plains to the central Appalachians. Midlevel and low-level lapse rates are respectable, with backed surface winds likely along the various segments of the front. There are many examples of past Midwest tornado events that have occurred in this type of pattern.

Limiting factors include: 1.) a monster cap with 750mb temps as warm as 15c. Some runs are not breaking any convection out anywhere along the boundary. 2.) Westerly to west-northwesterly flow aloft in most areas will tend to make storms drift away from the boundary, though low-level SRH will be enhanced by this relative motion. Thus any regions with a southerly component of flow aloft (as in one of the ripples in the flow) would be favored to help a storm deviate on the boundary.

Target is unclear right now due to yet-to-be-resolved small scale waves in the mean upper flow and the exact position of the surface boundary. Right now Indiana is shown with a nice little embedded shortwave passing at 00z and turning flow southwesterly, but this is likely to change.
 
Models have backed off a little on the strength of the inversion, but still are not breaking out precip down on the boundary. The GFS forecast soundings along I-72 at 00z show it getting close, however. The environment just north of the front looks quite good for an Illinois sleeper tornado or two if a storm can get going. Watch visible satellite intently on Saturday morning/afternoon for clues on storm initiation.
 
Example from latest NAM:
2018051118_NAM_030_39.5,-88.03_severe_ml.png
 
Yeah it's a long shot, but a slight improvement in upper support or H7 temps in the next 24 hours could make a huge difference. A realtime obs kind of day....
 
Back
Top