Jeff Snyder
EF5
This is more of a pre-emptive note of caution.
(3) Prohibited content. Users may NOT post the following:
* Weather bulletins and forecast images, except as brief excerpts, in moderation, and with an explanation of their meteorological relevance;
* Links without an explanation of their meteorological relevance;
* Noise: posts containing only exclamations, salutations, witticisms, or personal anecdote (e.g. "I sure hope we get a storm. Bye!");
(4) Forecasts & Nowcasts forum. In the Forecasts & Nowcasts forum, we allow two types of messages, as follows.
* FCST is for discussing forecast aspects of severe weather that has not occurred yet, from now up to 7 days in the future
* NOW is for discussing forecast aspects of severe weather that is occurring right now or within the last 60 minutes (photos and third-party reports are allowed).
Remember -- if you are posting about the possibility of convection in your area, you should being using the FCST thread. If you are addressing convection or activity that is ongoing, you may use this NOW thread. In other words, is the meat of your post addressing FUTURE weather (if so, use the FCST thread), or is it addressing CURRENT weather (use the NOW thread)? If you are addressing the potential of a current/ongoing storm, then posting in this NOW thread would be okay. If you're wondering about initiation in some location currently devoid of convection, then hop on over to the FCST thread. There will only be this "overlap" time until we see more activity in the risk area (perhaps only an hour more if the convection near LZK takes hold).
In addition, please remember that this a forum, so some (usually short) posts may be better suited for a chat room than a forum. I know we can all get excited about this, but the forum works much better (and has less clutter) if people "save up" their thoughts enough to post a couple of multi-sentence or multi-paragraph posts as opposed to a myriad of very short (1 or 2 sentence) posts. This is not meant to discourage the posting of relevant information, but please keep the above-quote two rules in mind.
(3) Prohibited content. Users may NOT post the following:
* Weather bulletins and forecast images, except as brief excerpts, in moderation, and with an explanation of their meteorological relevance;
* Links without an explanation of their meteorological relevance;
* Noise: posts containing only exclamations, salutations, witticisms, or personal anecdote (e.g. "I sure hope we get a storm. Bye!");
(4) Forecasts & Nowcasts forum. In the Forecasts & Nowcasts forum, we allow two types of messages, as follows.
* FCST is for discussing forecast aspects of severe weather that has not occurred yet, from now up to 7 days in the future
* NOW is for discussing forecast aspects of severe weather that is occurring right now or within the last 60 minutes (photos and third-party reports are allowed).
Remember -- if you are posting about the possibility of convection in your area, you should being using the FCST thread. If you are addressing convection or activity that is ongoing, you may use this NOW thread. In other words, is the meat of your post addressing FUTURE weather (if so, use the FCST thread), or is it addressing CURRENT weather (use the NOW thread)? If you are addressing the potential of a current/ongoing storm, then posting in this NOW thread would be okay. If you're wondering about initiation in some location currently devoid of convection, then hop on over to the FCST thread. There will only be this "overlap" time until we see more activity in the risk area (perhaps only an hour more if the convection near LZK takes hold).
In addition, please remember that this a forum, so some (usually short) posts may be better suited for a chat room than a forum. I know we can all get excited about this, but the forum works much better (and has less clutter) if people "save up" their thoughts enough to post a couple of multi-sentence or multi-paragraph posts as opposed to a myriad of very short (1 or 2 sentence) posts. This is not meant to discourage the posting of relevant information, but please keep the above-quote two rules in mind.
Last edited by a moderator: