Jeff Snyder
EF5
Tonight's NAM run actually has an interesting setup for Wednesday, with moderate instability developing ahead of the plunging cold front by afternoon. Flow at all levels are relatively strong, and shear profiles will be favorable for supercells (0-6km shear of 50-65kts, 0-3km SRH >250m2/s2, etc). Heck, tonight's OUN sounding only had ~700 j/kg SBCAPE, and a decent small supercell developed and moved across portions of central and north-central Oklahoma.
Of course, one of the biggest issues may be storm mode -- a rapidly-moving cold front with strong convergence along it doesn't scream "discrete convection"! The NAM is currently showing the deep-layer shear vector to be towards the northeast immediately along the front, though showing a greater easterly component the farther south of I40 one goes. Depending upon what kind of dryline can develop, there is the chance for a better shear vector - initiating boundary orientation that would favor discrete supercells. The GFS appears to be more aggressive with the cold front movement, which I'm airing towards given that these strong fronts tend to come barreling down the Plains in a fashion faster than the models indicate. So, I'm setting my very-preliminary sights on far northern Texas. If the cold front takes on an E-W orientation down there, any storms that develop would be undercut by the southward-moving front.
With 60+kts at 500mb, I can't imagine many storms will be moving less than 40kts. At least it's not in the 'rocket-boosters required' category that characterized most of the March and April chase setups. And hey, I can't deny a chase that could end with me arriving at my apartment in sleet or freezing rain! I included MO and KS in this given the potential for elevated activity, but I think the best potential for supercells and any tornadoes is south of I40 (and probably south of the Red River).
Of course, one of the biggest issues may be storm mode -- a rapidly-moving cold front with strong convergence along it doesn't scream "discrete convection"! The NAM is currently showing the deep-layer shear vector to be towards the northeast immediately along the front, though showing a greater easterly component the farther south of I40 one goes. Depending upon what kind of dryline can develop, there is the chance for a better shear vector - initiating boundary orientation that would favor discrete supercells. The GFS appears to be more aggressive with the cold front movement, which I'm airing towards given that these strong fronts tend to come barreling down the Plains in a fashion faster than the models indicate. So, I'm setting my very-preliminary sights on far northern Texas. If the cold front takes on an E-W orientation down there, any storms that develop would be undercut by the southward-moving front.
With 60+kts at 500mb, I can't imagine many storms will be moving less than 40kts. At least it's not in the 'rocket-boosters required' category that characterized most of the March and April chase setups. And hey, I can't deny a chase that could end with me arriving at my apartment in sleet or freezing rain! I included MO and KS in this given the potential for elevated activity, but I think the best potential for supercells and any tornadoes is south of I40 (and probably south of the Red River).
Last edited by a moderator: