• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

11/14/05 NOW: Southern Mississippi Valley

Joined
Oct 10, 2004
Messages
1,442
Location
Madison, WI
Discrete storms firing in central and southern Arkansas with a severe warning for Grant County. With 0-6 km shear ranging from 45-50 kt and ~1,000 j/kg mlcape I could see some of these storms taking on supercellular characteristics, although the tornado threat seems conditional (SFC-1km shear 150 m2/s2) on a storm having its rotation enhanced by a boundary.

Note: Numbers from SPC mesoanalysis. I hope I read the maps correctly...
 
Well, deep-layer shear is pretty poor invof previously SVR-warned storm -- and remains poor throughout the warm sector (with +45kts effective to the north of the warm front). Storms appear to be rather elevated (cluster near LZK) but given the deepening/moistening boundary layer -- with increasing surface temps -- some storms could become surface-based and could ingest unstable boundary layer parcels. However, as mentioned above, the poor vertical shear will result in only brief severe thunderstorms. Not really seeing the warranting of a red box... But given the marginal <100m2/s2 0-1km SRH in the warm sector, I wouldn't be surprised to see a brief tornado to come out of any storm that can sustain itself long enough to produce.
 
Very nice isolated supercell in northeast MS ongoing at the moment... With some decent low-level rotation between Plantersville and Fulton. If the storm can sustain itself for a little while, I wouldn't be surprised if it produces a tornado (the atmosphere is favorable for a isolated, but rather short-lived supercells thanks to the poor vertical shear).
 
Large Red-Box is now out for OK/MO/AR. The watch box looks like it cuts Norman in half where it lies. I'd expect storms to start becoming more numerous here in OK and probably some warm front nocturnal supercells. Hopefully people don't get caught offguard tonight
 
Back
Top