John Farley
Supporter
Below are several articles regarding a difficult dilemma faced by the Army Corps of Engineers. Under an plan dating to 1928, and pretty much signed off on by everyone involved (back when there wasn't an actual flood), the Corps has the right to blow up a levee and flood about half of Mississippi County, MO, in order to save the city of Cairo, IL from catastrophic flooding. The plan has only been used once, back in 1937. But with the Ohio River at Cairo (where it flows into the Mississippi) expected to crest in the next day or two at a foot higher than the record crest, it may be used again. It is possible that the only way to prevent the entire city of Cairo and its 3,000 residents from being flooded is to flood farmland in the river flats of Mississippi County, MO - putting nearly half the county and thousands of acres of farmland, and the homes of about 90 people, under water. A judge has ruled that the Corps plan is legal and the Corps has the legal right to blow the levee. For now, the Corps is holding off on doing so - but it presents a classic moral dilemma - take an action that will flood out 90 people and thousands of acres of farms (who may not be able to collect on their insurance because it is a human act), or take no action with the result that 30 times as many people will be flooded out. This makes me REALLY glad that I am not the person that has to make this decision!
The first article gives an overview of the situation; the second describes to legal arguments and the court case, and third is a brief article on the cout's decision and the reaction of the Illinois governor to it. (Missouri has taken the opposite position in the case; Kentucky, which is also impacted, has sided with Illinois.)
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_4b291d28-a1d6-5c8d-a996-c82d8ec59d3e.html
http://www.stltoday.com/news/state-...cle_c5a36dba-3c48-5b82-a2b5-dce3f9f419e9.html
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/illinois/article_d79f3680-7296-11e0-88be-0019bb30f31a.html
The first article gives an overview of the situation; the second describes to legal arguments and the court case, and third is a brief article on the cout's decision and the reaction of the Illinois governor to it. (Missouri has taken the opposite position in the case; Kentucky, which is also impacted, has sided with Illinois.)
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_4b291d28-a1d6-5c8d-a996-c82d8ec59d3e.html
http://www.stltoday.com/news/state-...cle_c5a36dba-3c48-5b82-a2b5-dce3f9f419e9.html
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/illinois/article_d79f3680-7296-11e0-88be-0019bb30f31a.html