• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Steering Hurricanes?

These articles periodically appear, and they always promote the same carnival schemes involving black dust, diaper gel, nukes, and so on. In my opinion, the money and intellectual energy would be better spent on forecast-oriented research and preparedness-- for example, ways to make cities like New Orleans less vulnerable in the first place. As the NHC so eloquently puts it, rather than trying to screw with natural processes, maybe the answer is to learn how to better coexist with them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There was something about at least one of these on a Discovery Channel show. The big problem is how the studies handle the clouds. We don't really understand clouds nor can we really model them nicely; so some studies will only use water in the cloud with no ice or use all ice. As is usually the case with studies like these, the whole experiment is (probably) not being explained. Just an FYI to those not used to modeling studies: the devil is incredibly in the details; and sometimes the details are not real world at all! :D
 
I wonder if they've considered the possibility of this making the hurricane angry and hence making it stronger? Maybe I should right a paper on this and see if I can get it published in the Telegraph.
 
You do realize Jerry that the Drudge Report is simply posting links to other news outlets stories, like the Washington Times, New York Times, and in this instance the UK Telegraph. Only extremely rarely are their articles posted on there by Matt Drudge himself, and so what if there were. I fail to understand how going to the Drudge Report to pick up the days headlines is scary. It's no different than any other website that posts links to OTHER NEWS OUTLETS stories for the day. I hope you also realize that it gets millions upon millions of visitors, so there must be a lot of scary people out there. It's the equivalent of me posting a link to Mike Hollingshead's website on mine and then you criticize me for the content on his site. It makes no sense.
 
I guess that someone in those projects will also come up with a plan on how to deal with the effect on oceanic life when all that black rubber, diaper gel or whatever other compound eventually finds its way down.
 
Back
Top