South Dakota - (2002 law) - Literally interpreted as written, possession/use
by anyone who has in the last 10 years been convicted of a felony, in SD
or other states, is
illegal. Use by
anyone else seems implied to be okay. However, licensed ham radio operators exempted. (Though ... why exempt hams if it's okay for everyone else to have them?) These people just can't seem to get around to stating exactly what they mean or intend. Is their intent is to ban scanners from general civilian use, except for those with prior written permission, or exemption by federal license? (They go as far as to list those exemptions, later down the list.) Did they mean that use in the furtherance of a crime is illegal, but for everyone else, it's okay? For this reason, to be safe, I advise treating this law as if it were
meant to ban the general public from possession of a scanner (I know it's confusing, but I didn't write this law), and local citizens should call their local legislative office to find out EXACTLY what they mean. This kind of vague, lazy legislation is dangerous, not to mention unfair, because if the street officers have it that its intended for all civilians, and yet the law states another thing, then a lot of scanners could potentially be confiscated and people ticketed unjustly, and not to mention illegally. The potential IS there. Again, this one gets a cautious ORANGE color coding because the wording needs MUCH improving.
Wording too indecisive, here.