• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Particularly Dangerous Situation

Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
226
Location
Ypsilanti, MI
I get that it means a whole mess of nasty tornadoes are likely in the watch area. Nevermind one on the ground coming for a populated area.

What I really want to know is:

What criteria do forecasters use to establish a watch area as being a Particularly Dangerous Situation? Is there a specific set of numeric conditions used?
 
Interesting, I didn't know about their goal of 3/4 of PDS watches verifying with multiple intense tornadoes. It might take some work, but I'd be curious to know how close SPC is to that level of verification.
 
I get that it means a whole mess of nasty tornadoes are likely in the watch area. Nevermind one on the ground coming for a populated area.

What I really want to know is:

What criteria do forecasters use to establish a watch area as being a Particularly Dangerous Situation? Is there a specific set of numeric conditions used?



Most of the time a PDS watch goes with a mod or high risk and are usually associated with major tornado outbreaks or derechoes. Not always though.
 
What criteria do forecasters use to establish a watch area as being a Particularly Dangerous Situation? Is there a specific set of numeric conditions used?

This is quoted from the link that rdale posted above, it gives a pretty good answer to your question.

"The Particularly Dangerous Situation wording is used in Tornado Watches for rare situations when long-lived intense tornadoes are likely. This enhanced wording may also accompany Severe Thunderstorm Watches for widespread significant severe events, usually produced by exceptionally intense derechos. PDS watches are issued, when in the opinion of the forecaster, the likelihood of significant events is boosted by very volatile atmospheric conditions. Usually this decision is based on a number of atmospheric clues and parameters, so the decision to issue a PDS watch is subjective with no hard criteria. However, the SPC goal is to have 3 out of every 4 PDS Tornado Watches verifying with multiple intense tornadoes. PDS watches are most often issued with a High risk in Day 1 Convective Outlooks."
 
I looked at the watches issued during the first 5 months of 2011, for 396 of those I did get the probabilities from SPC.

17 out of 396 were marked as PDS (4.3%)

Looking at the probabilities for 2 or more tornadoes:

5-70%: 0 PDS
80% : 8 No PDS, 4 PDS
90% : 1 No PDS, 8 PDS
>95% : 5 PDS


Similarly, looking at the chances for 1 or more F2-F5 tornadoes:

2-50%: 0 PDS
60% : 2 No PDS, 6 PDS
>70% : 11 PDS


Two of the PDS watches were for cases with 80% prob for 2 or more tornadoes, combined with 60% prob for strong tornadoes. Hail/Wind probs for these cases also were not extremely high.

So indeed it seems there is no 100% strict mapping from these probabilities to a Yes/No decision on a PDS Watch.
 
Back
Top