• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

NWS budget cuts

On another forum, someone is saying that the ITO role is critical because they fulfill WFO application development duties. Can anyone speak to this? Are the WFOs creating a bunch of useful applications, and is it usually the ITO that's doing this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
saying that the ITO role is critical because they fulfill WFO application development duties. Can anyone speak to this? Are the WFOs creating a bunch of useful applications, and is it usually the ITO that's doing this?

Not the job of the NWS to create apps. Job of the NWS is to provide forecasts and warnings and to create/maintain the meteorological infrastructure.

We need the ITO to keep things running, especially in critical wx.
 
Not really, allowing UAV's to fly in the US is something that is needed as we move into the future.

Regarding ITOs, they aren't developing "apps" in the iPhone sense of the word. They are able to customize / add-on to AWIPS(1&2) to assist in the forecast process. Non-ITO's can also do so, but the ITO position in my guess has more time to do so.
 
As a reminder, please remember that political discussion is only allowed in B&G. Obviously, this entire topic (NWS funding) is intricately wrapped in policy decisions at the federal government level. However, please keep all comments directly relevant to the NWS, NOAA, and publicly-funded weather entities. Discussions regarding broader political issues are only allowed in B&G.
 
Back
Top