• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

northwest flow environment

The only thing I can tell is that it is more common during the summer months. I have seen a few nasty storms occur in June, July in MO.
 
IIRC, the large solitary supercell that passed through Central Illinois late last summer (date eludes me) occured in NW flow. That had some amazing structure, both on radar and from the pictures I have seen.
 
Originally posted by Bill Hark
Does anyone have a idealized picture of a supercell in a northwest flow environment? This is a situation I am not as experienced in chasing, and I have been having trouble finding good info.

Bill Hark
http://www.harkphoto.com

Bill,

For the most part, a supercell is a supercell is a supercell. You can essentially just "turn" the soutwest-flow supercell 90 degrees clockwise, and you'll get a northwest-flow supercell. The updraft is still on the upwind (aloft) side of the storm, except that is to the northwest of the FFDR / precip core instead of the southwest side of the FFD/precip core for the northwest-flow aloft regime.
 
Hi Bill. If I remember right, the June 9th. '03 O'Neill, Nebraska F-3 monster dirty barrel was via northwest flow. As well as the F-2 Stuart, Nebraska prior to it.
There are a lot of wonderful videos of those. I've got 3 or 4 of 'em from different guys. My chase partner and cousin Doren and I were on both of 'em from the gitgo.
 
Originally posted by Michael P. Morris
IIRC, the large solitary supercell that passed through Central Illinois late last summer (date eludes me) occured in NW flow. That had some amazing structure, both on radar and from the pictures I have seen.

Yeah, this was in July, and hit Roanoke, I think. Did F4 damage to some industrial buildings. I remember watching it on satellite and it was heading around a ridge, moving SE, like a right mover, except that the anvil was also blowing SELY, which has interesting implications for inflow temperature modification.
 
The storm reports map for July 13 is very striking; the map shows the evolution of a lone supercell in NW Illinois to a full--blown derecho stretching down to Alabama and Georgia. I experienced my first derecho that day. What surprised me was that the high winds lasted about 20 to 30 minutes, not at all like an ordinary severe squall-line thunderstorm.
 
The Plainfield IL F5 of August 1990 also occured under similar northwest upper level flow. At the weather seminar here they did a comparison of how close the Roanoke F4 of last year was to the Plainfield F5. When you have surface Td's of 80 and very cold air streaming in from the northwest you get a huge amount of instability. 5000 JKg in the Roanoke storm and 8000 JKg in the Plainfield storm IIRC.
 
Back
Top