• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

More reasons to be mad at the Spotter Network

The original comment I was making was they I didn't think it fair to loose the ability to track someone, a person or group of persons working with a well structured network. Most. if not all would not
submit a report via SN, but rather through one of the multiple systems we have in place.

Tim,

If you or your group want to use some of the SN's functionality, then take the test. If your group does not want to take the test, then don't do it and move along. It's as simple as that.

I don't understand why you are carrying on about this across multiple threads.

Bryan
 
Tim,

If you or your group want to use some of the SN's functionality, then take the test. If your group does not want to take the test, then don't do it and move along. It's as simple as that.

I don't understand why you are carrying on about this across multiple threads.

Bryan

Maybe the name of this thread lead to it maybe?
" More reasons to be mad at the Spotter Network"

Moving along is good if you do not wish to change something
or try too.

For me the issue is settled.

Always takes two to tango.

Tim
 
I support this change as well. Real names give some accountability.

My situation is worse than Zach or Zarchry in an earlier post. My FCC callsign is registered to my legal name, David. Rick comes from my middle name "Derrick" and I have gone by Rick my entire life. I imagine this is relatively common.

Everyone knows me as Rick and wouldn't have a clue who David is. This includes the NWS as well as my local EOC where I serve as ARES liaison. Since I am kind of an "old timer", I pretty much have to stick with my nickname.

Since the SN form rejected my callsign entry, I just put my call in the "Note" section. I hope that this is OK.
 
Thanks, Tyler. Will do.

EDIT - That worked like a champ. This is a good tip for those of us that have nicknames.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top