• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Lightning at LAX

Hi Richard,

Yes, that fourth image shows a departing flight out of LAX, towards the storm. The jets were taking off towards the west, which is typical, and then turning sharply to avoid the cell.

That image was actually a much longer exposure than I had intended. While adjusting the aperture setting, I had just inadvertently set the shutter speed to 30 seconds (instead of leaving it on "bulb"). The CG occurred a few seconds after I had opened the shutter, and I tried to end the exposure, but my camera would not allow that until the 30 seconds had elapsed! The image wound up very overexposed, but I made it look somewhat decent with Photoshop. It was lucky that the aircraft was taking off into the frame at the time. Most of the LAX CG shots were 4 to 8 second exposures at about f6.1 to f8 (ISO 100), and I estimate that the lightning activity was four to eight miles away.

Bill
 
I like the "string of pearls" from the plane's flashers of #4 and the big X in the sky of #8. Nice work.
 
Damn Bill, those are rather amazing! And that is with the location aside. Add in the location and they are exceptional! Those should be a hair marketable if one wanted. Congrats.
 
Very cool! Lightning at airports is difficult, there is so much light pollution. Not to mention, how many thunderstorm nights occur near the PCH =) Nice work!
 
Back
Top