• A student is looking for help on tropical cyclone prediction. Please fill out the survey linked to this thread: https://stormtrack.org/threads/storm-and-hurricane-intensity-prediction-survey.32957
  • After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Just got my Canon Digital Rebel

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
Something I noticed on Aaron's middle shot (awesome, by the way), is that he set his drive mode on continuous, which I had never thought of doing for some reason. That would be a great way of increasing your chances of getting a bolt in the shot -

Great shots, Aaron ...
 
... my next lens will probably be the Tamron SP AF17-35mm Di LD, which was designed with the digital size limitations in mind.

Do you think this makes sense in the long haul though? These lenses are just much smaller and hence cheaper for better quality now, but wouldn't you expect that full frame CMOS is coming down the pipeline, and then you won't be able to use any of your smaller frame lenses? I think I'd still recommend getting regular size lenses with the hopes of still using them 10 years from now and replacing the body as better technology comes along.

Glen
 
I encourage you to make an investment in good lenses. Your lenses should last a long time and you want the best you can afford. Camera body technology will come and go but lenses haven't really changed in centuries. Ok, they have changed a lot...but they still use glass...just like Galileo used.
 
Lenses are of equal - and possibly even greater at times - value as the body, in my mind. It works the same as astronomy for those of you into that ... you learn in time that aperature is much more important to you than magnification. Camera lenses work similarly ... having a fast lens is more important to me than zoom (even with digital) any day of the week. I'm only just now realizing how true this is -

As for the digitally-optimized lenses ... here's what Shutterbug said:

Optimized for digital SLRs, the Di-series is just as desirable for use with 35mm cameras ... ultra-wide angle lenses particularly benefit from special optical designs in order to produce the best possible results with digital SLR cameras.

Was a cool article because it fits the lens on both film SLR and digital to demonstrate the differences between the smaller cmos sensor and a frame of 35mm film.

When it comes to lenses, I am just way more interested in things like sharpness, contrast, color and resolution. All of the lenses I use are perfectly interchangeable with film SLR cameras. That was one of the reasons I wasn't really interested in the kit lens that comes with the 300D ... it's made only for the digital rebel and has a special collar that fits the lens closer to the chip for better results ... but I want to be able to interchange lenses between film and digital, so I didn't go for the D300 kit.
 
Back
Top