• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Is this possible

STurner

EF2
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
182
Location
Shawnee, KS 66217
I know size and forward movement of tornadoes may cause certain types of damage to different structures. I just wonder if it would be possible if a small 50-100yd wide tornado to move at 70-80mph and still create EF5 damage to structures. I figured that at this size and this movement a structure may only be affected for about two to three seconds.
 
In this case, it would probably be more likely for a SLOWER moving tornado to cause more damage to any given structure. Damage to the structure would probably be increased due to the increased time of exposure to winds and flying debris. However, these things are usually taken into account by survey teams. Regardless, you're not going to get an EF2 doing this resulting in EF5 damage.
 
This is a good topic. Years ago the Jarrell, TX F5 tornado's rating was scrutinized by some who felt the peak winds were only the in F3 range, and the tornado did its damage based on the fact it moved very slowly, and just sort of "ground down" the structures it hit. I never agreed with this philosophy because it's based on windspeed estimations and not damage sustained, which is exactly the opposite of what the F-scale was designed around.

The fact that damage occurs to a certain degree (per F-scale) is the only factor that should be accounted for when rating a tornado (based on the updated EF DIs), whether it was pure wind damage from an F5 or a grinding down of structures from slower winds that stayed put for a long duration. It doesn't matter what the windspeed estimation was, because we have no way of truly knowing and all the DOW measurements have been generally ruled out due to margin of error either way of around 25mph or so. So IMO it makes no sense to quabble over how strong a tornado may or may not have been when we stress damage over windspeed, and have no way to measure ground windspeed.
 
Back
Top