Cory Schuller
EF1
Before somebody yells at me I know this has been talked about before and I have searched the results but I just wanted to see if opinions have changed. I ran GRlevel 3 and Threatnet this year and I'm needing to cut back on costs so once again I would like to know what is the best way to go. I can see advantages going both ways and also disadvantages. The main thing on Threatnet that I used was the Shear markers. Is this feature pretty accurate on areas of strongest rotation? I know Grlevel 3 also has rotation markers but the Threatnet is just point and click. I do a lot of night time spotting for the local emergency management team so just doing a visual on the clouds to see areas of concern is difficult. If we see something on radar that at least it gives us an area to concentrate on.
Also how many people use the F5 Data package. I see Andrew (great guy and I have lots of respect for him) is offering the 299 lifetime package again. What are the thoughts on the software package?
Oh and by the way I would sell the Threatnet to cover the costs of the F5 package.........
Thanks
Cory
Also how many people use the F5 Data package. I see Andrew (great guy and I have lots of respect for him) is offering the 299 lifetime package again. What are the thoughts on the software package?
Oh and by the way I would sell the Threatnet to cover the costs of the F5 package.........
Thanks
Cory