Bill Tabor
EF5
A lot of us often complain about the lack of timeliness and accuracy of Mobile Threatnet. I've had a few occasions where I saw a core on the screen directly ahead only to have it visually on the right side of the road already. My question though is how does it compare to Grlevelx, or Weathertap and similar services we are all used to having. I've been assuming Threatnet isn't as accurate as Grlevelx placement wise but we may be surprised.
Today I did a short chase about 20 miles round trip and when I pulled up in the driveway and obtained wifi with Threatnet still running I was in the middle of a hailstorm of nickel hail. I stayed in the vehicle cause it looked like those things would hurt. Eventually pulled partway in to the garage and after a minute or so compared Threatnet and Grlevelx. I believe it had been a few minutes at least when I looked and sure enough Grlevelx showed the storm to the east and Threatnet showed it still overhead. I then noticed the activity light was red. Oh yeah, you have to have a line of sight to the sky for Threatnet. So I backed up in the driveway and after a few minutes it had updated. I compared the two current images while zoomed in showing the towns of Cedar Park and Leander as well as the Williamson county line and Hwy 183. Both showed my vehicle just to the west of the storm echo which had just left. Seemed that Grlevelx had a better more formed shaped as opposed to a rounder more 'blobbier' shape of Threatnet, but they seemed to be lined up mostly over the same real estate.
So, I believe based on that one test they may be similar. What are your results? I'd like to have a number of us test this preferably with GPS, but running Threatnet and another leading package while looking at a storm and see if it is accurate, how much time shifted, and if the two radars show the precip in similar locations. I believe any timing errors should be magnified with faster moving storm motions.
Today I did a short chase about 20 miles round trip and when I pulled up in the driveway and obtained wifi with Threatnet still running I was in the middle of a hailstorm of nickel hail. I stayed in the vehicle cause it looked like those things would hurt. Eventually pulled partway in to the garage and after a minute or so compared Threatnet and Grlevelx. I believe it had been a few minutes at least when I looked and sure enough Grlevelx showed the storm to the east and Threatnet showed it still overhead. I then noticed the activity light was red. Oh yeah, you have to have a line of sight to the sky for Threatnet. So I backed up in the driveway and after a few minutes it had updated. I compared the two current images while zoomed in showing the towns of Cedar Park and Leander as well as the Williamson county line and Hwy 183. Both showed my vehicle just to the west of the storm echo which had just left. Seemed that Grlevelx had a better more formed shaped as opposed to a rounder more 'blobbier' shape of Threatnet, but they seemed to be lined up mostly over the same real estate.
So, I believe based on that one test they may be similar. What are your results? I'd like to have a number of us test this preferably with GPS, but running Threatnet and another leading package while looking at a storm and see if it is accurate, how much time shifted, and if the two radars show the precip in similar locations. I believe any timing errors should be magnified with faster moving storm motions.