Guys, like I said... I hope I'm wrong and I wish the investor and the developer all the luck in the world. I absolutely agree that a Radarscope/GRLevel3 type app for the Android would be a very desirable thing. As a likely Verizon network Android owner (by next chase season) I would be a very likely buyer of such an app.
But I would submit that this particular app is a magnitude or two more difficult than the ones that have been brought to market thus far (something that Mike already apparently discovered for himself), and I stand by my assertion that it is going to take ANY developer in the world far longer than month to code such a thing.
I'll also be the first to say that there is no shame in taking longer than 30 days to deliver, as long as the product is worth delivering... so
more power to them. I just think that from a business standpoint, exceeding your customers
realistic expectations is better than setting expectations too high, which only leaves you downside/disappointment in the eyes of your potential customers. The subject line of this thread is not just that there will soon be a good Android radar app on the horizon (which would be great news by itself), but that it is going to be the "Best darn radar app period" and that it will be delivered in (what I believe) is an unrealistic time frame. Nowhere to go but down from there -- unless of course you can
deliver the "Best darn radar app period" and do it in a month. If by November 1st we are looking at the release of a working version of this app, I'll be the first to tip my cap and eat my words.
I think one big question you have to ask yourself is: Why haven't the developers who know the roadmap to a great radar app already released one for the Android if it is so easy (only a month of development time). They already know the roadmap to the programming logic and the basic issues involved... they would just need to translate that to the Android OS development tools. If nothing else, they could do what Mike is doing and hire a proven Android developer to do the coding for them. The answer (I believe) is twofold: 1) The Android market is not (yet?) the moneymaker that the iPhone/iPod Touch or desktop PC market is. And 2) Developing for an OS that is a rapidly moving target
can be an expensive exercise in futility. This has been a problem
for a while now and it continues to be one. When you develop a successful app, it not only needs to run on the OS that is current when it is released, but it will need to be updated when future OS versions break something in your app.
Mike, I do appreciate your developing for the chase community (and I do not count myself among the Drama Queens on Stormtrack, so this is all I will say on the subject). If you can deliver a great Android radar app (in
any time frame before next chase season) you will no doubt be able to count me in along with your other satisfied customers. Good luck!