• A student is looking for help on tropical cyclone prediction. Please fill out the survey linked to this thread: https://stormtrack.org/threads/storm-and-hurricane-intensity-prediction-survey.32957
  • After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Anniversary of the Killer Heat Event in Chicago 07-13-95

WGN weather tends to extremes

It seems to me that WGN's forecasts tend to be hotter in the summer than others. When everybody else said 94-96, they said 100. When other forecasts rose to 98, theirs rise to 101. When everybody caught up to them at 100, they jumped to 103. Unfortunately, this temperatures during this summer's heatwaves have tended to exceed forecast values, making WGN the best guess.

My guess is to go with the GFS (best record this year IMO) for the 850 mb temperature and simply advect dewpoints from the SSW. This would bring T850 of 25.0-25.5 C and dewpoints of 21.5 C. I added a conservative 14.8 C to T850, and got about 40 C or 104 F.

Now, the National Weather Service forecast calls for a T8 of 27-28 C, which is near the 1995 level. I hope they're wrong, since those seem to coincide with 41-43C (106-109 F) on the ground.

Update: The highest hourly reading at O'Hare (official reading, on NW side of city) was 102 F, at Midway (SW side) it hit 104 F. Dewpoints fell into the 60s over metro Chicago as temperatures soared, which kept the heat index under 110. Official high temperatures may be a bit higher when the NWS releases its 6-hour temperature data.
 
Part of the DVN afternoon discussion....

"SUNDAY...WITH A CAPPED ATMOSPHERE...AND EXTREMELY WARM AIR
ALOFT...WE WILL LIKELY SEE TEMPS WIDESPREAD IN THE 99 TO 104 RANGE.
IF DEEP MIXING TO 800 MB CAN OCCUR...AND THIS IS POSSIBLE...WE MAY
SEE SOME SPOTS IN THE 105 TO 110 RANGE...BUT IF THIS OCCURS IT
SHOULD BE ISOLATED. HEAT INDICES OF 105 TO 115 ARE LIKELY..."



I don't think temps will quite reach above 105, high dewpoints and extreme temps will make this fairly comparable to 1995. The only difference is the length of extreme heat. This looks to be a pretty quick shot of extreme heat, unlike the lengthy 1995 episode.
 
Back
Top