AEO Lightning Strike! Lightning Trigger??

In my experience, it performs quite poorly. Lightning sets it off, but then so does literally everything else in the known universe. Any kind of motion, ambient lights from your car in the back ground, pretty much anything at all.
 
It's unfortunate that they don't allow you to adjust the sensitivity. I have a StopShot module used for high speed photography which allows for adjustment, but it's too cumbersome to take out into the field.

I spoke briefly with someone on ebay that purchased the unit and he concurred with Ryan's assessment. However, he also said that the seller took $100/free shipping, instead of $132. For $100, I might still go for it, only because for $400 for the Lightning Trigger, I could get another lens for that price. :)

Thanks, Ryan...
 
A little research into filters (ghetto rigged) to reduce the sensitivity might help too. Just a quick thought.
 
I did a bunch of research on this and got the components to put together my own trigger (just another of my projects I need to carve out the time to actually get finished) :( and there are a couple of important parts to the design of a GOOD lightning trigger (though none of them are complicated).

Before buying, I'd suggest asking these three questions:
1) What sort of sensor is being used. Is it an ordinary photo-transistor (sensitive to a broad range of light) or is it sensitive to only IR (IMHO that is the only kind you want).
1b) If IR, then it is helpful to know what frequency of IR triggers the sensor. Basically you want it to be "blind" to visual light and trigger off the IR that is emitted by a lightning leader before the flash that we visually see. (This is the main reason lightning triggers work better than your reactions for daylight lightning photography). You can make a sensor blind to lower light by using the filter like Jason suggests, but you have to know what you are doing with filters. The dark red (like is on your old TV remotes blocks most light below infrared).
2) You want to know if the sensitivity is user-tune-able. (Like a potentiometer that allows you to tune it to where you want it to go off).
3) You want to know if the lightning trigger circuit is isolated from sending lethal voltage to your camera by an optocoupler. Your bargain lightning trigger won't seem like so much of a bargain if it fries your DSLR.

The components to build one yourself really don't cost much. I got enough to build two of them for $35 and plan to use old cheap-o electronic flash cases (gutted) to hold the circuit and slip in the hotshoe of the DSLR.

Sadly, one thing my K-x lacks that my K200D had is the remote shutter jack. However, this gives me an idea for an experiment: I wonder what the camera would do if I set it the camera for remote triggering and then tried to let the lightning do the triggering for me? One would have to make sure that they were not covering the IR window on the grip with one's hand (tripod mounting would be best). For the remote to work it needs to be within 5 meters of the camera, but that is probably due to the power limitations of the remote itself, not the camera's triggering mechanism, so a good lightning bolt might set it off. If so, then any camera with IR triggering capabilities already has a built-in lightning trigger we just don't normally set our cameras to that mode of operation. I have a sneaking hunch that this won't work, mainly because I think a lot of people smarter than me would have figured it out before now and I'm not finding any evidence that they have.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I did a bunch of research on this and got the components to put together my own trigger (just another of my projects I need to carve out the time to actually get finished) :( and there are a couple of important parts to the design of a GOOD lightning trigger (though none of them are complicated).

Darren,

I’ve had very good luck with my nighttime lightning photography, but when you stated the lightning trigger is better for daylight strikes, it really caught my interest. You said that you have done a lot of research on these and apparently found a set of plans that suited the very good criteria that was listed.

I hate to 'mooch' from another man's hard work, but sometimes it is the smart thing to do. Would you care to post a link to the plans/material list for this? I’d like to give it a try.
 
I have one of those $130 Ebay triggers, but haven't had a lot of varied opportunities to use it yet.

It does seem a little over-sensitive at times. It occasionally triggers off lightning strikes that are 90-degrees from where the trigger is pointed. At times it seems to trigger off car headlights, but I haven't done a proper test yet.

The on/off switch is a little unclear, using a "-" and "O" instead of "On" and "Off." Leaving it on accidentally can quickly sap the 9v battery.

The unit sticks out back from the hot shoe. On my 5DMkII, I have to remove the sensor in order to re-compose a shot. Otherwise the sensor hits me in the forehead before I can see through the viewfinder. To be fair, if it were mounted forward, it might get in the frame with wide angle lenses.

It is really only useful for daytime/early dusk shots where you're working with exposures shorter than 2-4 seconds. You're better off just shooting manually if you can work with longer exposures.

Still, expect a lot of "blanks" since the trigger will go off for in-cloud flashes, etc. It will still be a lot less "blanks" than you'd firing continuously, randomly, or relying on your own reaction time.

Keep in mind that daytime shots can be difficult to compose since there is often less contrast in the sky. The darker the clouds and background, the better the lightning will stand out.

I should have a better review after playing with it for a few more weeks.

-Mike
 
i'm having problems finding the page where the plan I'm using is found. It was on a spanish or portuguese language forum and I had to translate it. Anyway, here is an alternative plan that people seem to like. It uses an Arduino board as it's heart, which adds a little to the cost but reduces the amount you have to build.

Some examples from people who built it: http://www.flickr.com/groups/weatherphoto/discuss/72157621671333211/

Lightning is relatively easy to get at night. In low light, take enough relatively long exposures and eventually you'll get a lightning strike.

The hard part is daylight short-exposure shots that capture a lightning strike. That's what a trigger will help you get. It will help if you can keep all the stuff that delays the shutter from firing out of the way. Turn off autofocus. (How tough it is it to manually focus at infinity?) If your camera has the ability to lock up the mirror and just fire the shutter, so much the better. That's another delay you'll have out of your way.
 
The unit sticks out back from the hot shoe. On my 5DMkII, I have to remove the sensor in order to re-compose a shot. Otherwise the sensor hits me in the forehead before I can see through the viewfinder. To be fair, if it were mounted forward, it might get in the frame with wide angle lenses...

Mike, instead of fighting with the sensor when you want to re-compose, you could simply use the live view feature on your camera. That way you don't need access to the viewfinder.

Thanks for the good advice. I love taking manual lightning shots at night. I really purchased this unit for daytime shots. Looking forward to hearing further reviews from you re: this item!
 
Don't waste your $97 on the lightning trigger.
Attached is an image I shot yesterday of a CG right in front of the camera using the lightning trigger.
 
Charles...LOL

I was hoping the cheap lightning trigger would be effective, I don't care if it's overly sensitive and takes too many photos. Charles example above would be a good reason not buy it.
 
The fundamental flaw with any trigger is that it's reacting to the flash of light, meaning it won't capture the initial flash that triggered it. I've hesitated trusting a trigger, because I typically want to have the shutter open before the lightning hits, day, dusk or night. During the day, this means short bursts of 1 or 2 second exposures at a narrow aperture F11-F16+ (which is only a good for intense, freqent lightning). This exposure time gets longer and longer after sunset.

For most daytime cases though, human reflexes are reasonably good at the 'reaction' technique, which is essentially what a trigger unit does automatically. I use this frequently. Most lightning events consist of propagation and return stroke components that a photographer can easily open the shutter in time to catch the latter sequences of the discharge, such as secondary return strokes, clustered CGs, anvil crawlers and more. A trigger offers little advantage over this other than a hands-off, and slightly faster, operation of what you could easily do manually.

For illustration - this is a compilation video of upward strikes to towers. For most of these, I was shooting stills simultaneously using the manual reaction technique. You can hear the shutter going off with each bolt as I reacted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J25aKjoZM3I

Some of the stills:

http://stormhighway.com/storms/lightning/upward_tower/

For single-stroke CGs during the day, the only way to capture is to do constant bursts of short exposures. Triggering, either via auto unit or manual reaction, will miss these. If it is bright enough outside, sometimes it's impossible to get any exposure of reasonable length to not overexpose. You can only close the aperture so much before you start crimping the light from the actual lightning itself.

(Edited 4/7/12 to update broken link)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The point I made with my post is that even a close and very bright CG didn't even trigger it.

Oh. anybody want to buy a slightly used lightning trigger... Cheap?
 
Back
Top