David Wolfson
EF5
As I understand it the fuel rods are racked into arrays together with boronated neutron absorber material that makes the assembly solidly sub-critical until removed. In operation the circulating water itself helps regulate the fission because it acts as a neutron moderator and promotes the fission. The designs are hopefully somewhat fail-safe as a result since loss of coolant is supposed to stop the primary fission. Unfortunately there's a bucketload of other residual reactions going on that generate a lot of heat, especially if the core has been running for awhile.
I gather the fear with the spent-fuel pool is that the rack supports could be compromised and the fuel rods could conceivably collapse together like a fistful of straws into a critical pile. At any rate there will be enough heat to get the whole mass burning, smoking, and vaporizing in a nastily radioactive way. Fill it with water and you might both cool it and start the fission going which would result in something like the same effect as dumping water into a grease fire.
I gather the fear with the spent-fuel pool is that the rack supports could be compromised and the fuel rods could conceivably collapse together like a fistful of straws into a critical pile. At any rate there will be enough heat to get the whole mass burning, smoking, and vaporizing in a nastily radioactive way. Fill it with water and you might both cool it and start the fission going which would result in something like the same effect as dumping water into a grease fire.
Last edited by a moderator: