I have a hard time seeing through all that--especially the "numerous subtle impulses". A failure to appreciate nuance, perhaps.The main 500mb speed max is shown weakening as it approaches the Plains on Monday, with forcing becoming hodgepodge/nebulous as it overspreads the warm sector. I'm assuming that as a result of this, models seem to show numerous subtle impulses with alternating areas of lift that each fire storms/precip early in the day from Oklahoma/Texas through the Ohio Valley. That is in contrast to a nice, clean left exit region with an intact speed max.
Your remarks about the environment in S-OK/N-TX remind me that the "double-negative is not the same as the affirmative": "Not a lot to *not* like about the environment" falls short of saying, "There's a lot to like about the environment."I would favor the tail-end cell currently shown by most models somewhere in southern OK/ north TX for the best ambient low-level shear and most-uncontaminated-from-early-precip air mass. There's not a lot to *not* like abount the environment down there, especially the portrayal of the dryline farther west. With the warm front in my backyard, I'll likely be staying up here - but the amount of early-day storms and precip along the boundary here shown all day is concerning.
If the trend of widespread junkvection up here continues, I might consider a trip to SW/southern OK. I like the general configuration/juxtaposition of parameters there, and the latest model runs in more agreement on firing supercells on the dryline.
When I looked at the 500mb forecast winds this morning (3/31) and saw the 70kt isotach break up in the exit region, I kinda glossed over it--really did not know how literally to take the forecast for that particular feature, especially some 36 hours out. (Sounds like it can be taken literally.) Thanks!Sorry, that's why I don't work for the SPC
With an intact jet max, there should be a uniform/predictable area of lift arriving in the target area and firing *one* round of storms. What's shown now is the jet max weakening into multiple smaller/chaotic waves that each trigger convection and precipitation, each followed by an area of subsidence - all much harder to predict, harder to nail down timing/location, and more likely to ruin a setup altogether with clouds and early storms. Someone correct me if that's gobbledygook.
The Plains dryline portion of yesterday's event was initially being downplayed by models and the SPC in favor of the warm front, but it doesn't look all that bad now.