• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

VCP Training

rdale

EF5
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
7,562
Location
Lansing, MI
Don't know your 11 from your 221? WDTB posted VCP training today at http://wdtb.noaa.gov/modules/vcpTraining/index.html

There are now nine different VCPs available for operational use. Some have been around since the original deployment, while others are relatively new. The choice of VCP in real time is based on current or expected weather or data quality issues. It is also sometimes influenced by concerns about wear and tear on the WSR-88D hardware. This training package will address all of these contributors to VCP selection.
 
Drop the WCM a note, he'll be the main one that knows.
Ed Calinese? He couldn't find the Pitcher tornado on radar until another WFO called the WFO and asked them why they didn't have a warning on the storm despite the reports that were coming in.

He admitted to this during the spotter training class in Fayetteville, AR this year in their review of 08.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I suppose that's him - but to be honest I'm not quite sure all the rest of that is needed or respectful of his position.
 
I suppose that's him - but to be honest I'm not quite sure all the rest of that is needed or respectful of his position.

Why not?? It was a massive DEADLY tornado that had known warning issues out of that CWA. Is this not a good place to talk about it??

Bart, interestingly enough, there is more to that story than meets the eye. After the call was made there was still quite a bit of indecision as to what was really going on. All due to not looking at/changing VCP until after the fact.
 
Why not?? It was a massive DEADLY tornado that had known warning issues out of that CWA. Is this not a good place to talk about it??

Bart, interestingly enough, there is more to that story than meets the eye. After the call was made there was still quite a bit of indecision as to what was really going on. All due to not looking at/changing VCP until after the fact.
Oh trust me Lanny I know it all. Check your PM.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why not?? It was a massive DEADLY tornado that had known warning issues out of that CWA. Is this not a good place to talk about it??

Is the thread about VCP training, in the Educational forum, the appropriate place to discuss the decisionmaking process for a tornado event last year? Unless the decision to not warn was because of the VCP mode, I think the common sense answer is -- no.
 
12 isn't much better. It seems to get kinda wanky. Just look at the March 12, 2006 tornado that hit benton county, arkansas. Both INX and SRX have massive holes where the storm is.

For the 2006 event, VCP 12 was likely the best choice. VCP 212 (with its better handling of range folding) wasn't available until 2007.
 
Back
Top